HI to everyone!
I´m working on gmm model.
I have stata 14.
My data has 32 individuals and 13 years each of them.
The problem is that when I estimate the GMM with the following rutine:
xtabond2 pibe usa tasa tipo pet , gmm(l.pibe,collapse) iv(tasa tipo) ///
noleveleq nodiffsargan twostep orthogonal small
I do not get the F-stat value.
I use this method because theres endogeneity in the exchange rate (tasa )and the monetary policy (tipo) . I decided to use endogenous instruments, for that reason the model is a Differece GMM.
I also collapse the estimation because there are more instruments than groups, and I looked for robust estimation. The problem appears when I use a one step and two steps estimation, I know the two step is more efficient.
Why do not I have the F-stats output? Is it part of the estimation outcome?
Related Posts with GMM estimation problem and f-statistic
Generating new variables based on information in other observations in datasetI'm working with some NCAA football player data. I've reached a bit of a difficult (for me) data cle…
Within estimator singleton Code: sysuse auto split make encode make1, g(id) xtset id xtreg price displacement, fe Assume that …
How to calculate the Average Treatment Effect on the Untreated (ATU) vs. ATE/ATETQuite often, I am more interested in knowing how a treatment might improve the outcomes of the untre…
Creating new variables based on information from three other variablesI’m having some difficulty creating a new variable from three others. All variables are of binary ty…
metan Hazard Ratio log scaleHello, I am running cox regression and I want to make forest plot of my hazard ratios using metan. I…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to GMM estimation problem and f-statistic
Post a Comment