HI to everyone!
I´m working on gmm model.
I have stata 14.
My data has 32 individuals and 13 years each of them.
The problem is that when I estimate the GMM with the following rutine:
xtabond2 pibe usa tasa tipo pet , gmm(l.pibe,collapse) iv(tasa tipo) ///
noleveleq nodiffsargan twostep orthogonal small
I do not get the F-stat value.
I use this method because theres endogeneity in the exchange rate (tasa )and the monetary policy (tipo) . I decided to use endogenous instruments, for that reason the model is a Differece GMM.
I also collapse the estimation because there are more instruments than groups, and I looked for robust estimation. The problem appears when I use a one step and two steps estimation, I know the two step is more efficient.
Why do not I have the F-stats output? Is it part of the estimation outcome?
Related Posts with GMM estimation problem and f-statistic
conformability error in variance() and quadvariance() Is there a limit on the number of columns of the matrix we can pass to either variance() or quadva…
Rubustness Check in Panel Data Modelling: Sensitivity Analysis Modifying the Level of AggregationDear Statalist participants, I am running a panel data modeling in the municipality level of aggreg…
Time dummies in IV regression and interpretation of post-estimationDear All, I am running on Stata 14.0 an ivregress 2sls estimation as in the following code. Code: …
r(table) : when did this thing appear, why were we not told about it, and where is it documented?Good morning, Recently I (by chance) discovered that e-class commands such as -regress-, -probit-, …
Dummy trap(intercept) removal in stata. xtreg (AB9 Dne9* Dnr9* Dpe9* Dnr9*) note: Dnr9 omitted because of collinearity Random-effects GLS…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to GMM estimation problem and f-statistic
Post a Comment