Hi hope everyone is well
I recently read a paper that has confused me a little about the difference between two stages least squares and the fixed effects within estimator.
I also wanted to ask what people think would be best to use for my data.
I am running a regression
logarithmic differences of sales (sales growth) on rd intensity. I have lagged RD intensity by taking the average of RD intensity from 2 years and 3 years prior. This is because common study says RD takes 2 years to show up. But it also solves some endogeneity issues (reversed causality) does this mean I could use it as an instrument in 2SLS? Or shall I just stick with fixed effects within.
Thank you for your time
Related Posts with two stages least squares vs fixed effects within estimator , lagged variables
By Patient ID subtract dates if observation (admission ID) condition is metHi all, I'm working on a fairly large hospital readmission dataset with 350 vars and 1.5M observati…
Graphing in a nested loopHi. I am trying to graph across two variables using a nested loop. My first variable refers to disea…
xtabond2 command help, PLEASEHi all! I am just getting into GMM (dynamic panel) for the first time, and I'm having much difficult…
Variation within a groupHello To detect if the value of a numeric variable var_num changed within a group var_cat, I do this…
How can I do matching in case control study?Hello. I am doing my master´s degree Project, and it is about cost bacteria resistance disease (mor…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to two stages least squares vs fixed effects within estimator , lagged variables
Post a Comment