Hi hope everyone is well
I recently read a paper that has confused me a little about the difference between two stages least squares and the fixed effects within estimator.
I also wanted to ask what people think would be best to use for my data.
I am running a regression
logarithmic differences of sales (sales growth) on rd intensity. I have lagged RD intensity by taking the average of RD intensity from 2 years and 3 years prior. This is because common study says RD takes 2 years to show up. But it also solves some endogeneity issues (reversed causality) does this mean I could use it as an instrument in 2SLS? Or shall I just stick with fixed effects within.
Thank you for your time
Related Posts with two stages least squares vs fixed effects within estimator , lagged variables
How to run this formula on stata = [Standard Deviation * (trading days) 1/2 ] , for a number of series.Hello, In the attached data below, in the first column there is 1, 1, 1…. 1 which means first securi…
multiple imputation: mvn vs chainedHi Statalist Questions regarding issues encountered during -mi- have been asked many times in this …
Meta Analysis - Data input problemI am trying to learn meta analysis and I am using an example from Bland, An Introduction to Medical …
Stock Price Pattern recognition using kernel regression on stataHello. I am doing a paper on technical analysis pattern recognition using Stata. Below is my initial…
including a constant in a first difference mdoelI have the following question: I want to estimate the effect of retirement on the 'cesd-score' (whi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to two stages least squares vs fixed effects within estimator , lagged variables
Post a Comment