Hi hope everyone is well
I recently read a paper that has confused me a little about the difference between two stages least squares and the fixed effects within estimator.
I also wanted to ask what people think would be best to use for my data.
I am running a regression
logarithmic differences of sales (sales growth) on rd intensity. I have lagged RD intensity by taking the average of RD intensity from 2 years and 3 years prior. This is because common study says RD takes 2 years to show up. But it also solves some endogeneity issues (reversed causality) does this mean I could use it as an instrument in 2SLS? Or shall I just stick with fixed effects within.
Thank you for your time
Related Posts with two stages least squares vs fixed effects within estimator , lagged variables
Listing and retrieving data from SQL views when using odbcHi, I have data stored in a view in MS SQL Server and I am using ODBC to connect to this database f…
Phi coefficient and Point Bi-Serial*How to calculate the Phi coefficient and Point Bi-Serial for a complex sample after creating a surve…
Average Real Variability (ARV) and Variability Independent of Mean Blood PressureHi everyone, I'm Med Student and new using STATA. Currently, For a systolic blood pressure visit to…
Parallel lines assumption of ordered logit regressions with multiply imputed dataDear all, I am working with an imputed data set (M=50, N=1359) and use an ordered logisitc regressi…
Replace value from different row condtionsHello everyone I have a dataset with observations that have been matched, and I have a sample weight…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to two stages least squares vs fixed effects within estimator , lagged variables
Post a Comment