Hi hope everyone is well
I recently read a paper that has confused me a little about the difference between two stages least squares and the fixed effects within estimator.
I also wanted to ask what people think would be best to use for my data.
I am running a regression
logarithmic differences of sales (sales growth) on rd intensity. I have lagged RD intensity by taking the average of RD intensity from 2 years and 3 years prior. This is because common study says RD takes 2 years to show up. But it also solves some endogeneity issues (reversed causality) does this mean I could use it as an instrument in 2SLS? Or shall I just stick with fixed effects within.
Thank you for your time
Related Posts with two stages least squares vs fixed effects within estimator , lagged variables
SFA with sf_modelhi everyone, I met one problem when I use the SFA model to calculate the TFP. I am very grateful if …
preserve / restore through a do fileHello, it seems as if the commands preserve and restore don't function properly when they're execut…
estat icc reporting of Intra-cluster correlation in three-level linear regression (mixed) different from manually calculation...Hi, I'm analyzing a three-level model I've run with mixed. It produces the following table for the …
Clustering TendencyDear Stata Users, I want to evaluate the clustering tendency of my data set consisting of the observ…
Regression with double loop (chaning dependent and independent)Hi, i want to do a multiple regression on times series of 100 corporates. The problem is that not j…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to two stages least squares vs fixed effects within estimator , lagged variables
Post a Comment