. xtreg (AB9 Dne9* Dnr9* Dpe9* Dnr9*)
note: Dnr9 omitted because of collinearity
Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 342
Group variable: ID Number of groups = 2
R-sq: Obs per group:
within = 0.0000 min = 171
between = 0.0000 avg = 171.0
overall = 0.0177 max = 171
Wald chi2(3) = 6.09
corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.1072
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AB9 | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
Dne9 | -1.556464 1.428468 -1.09 0.276 -4.35621 1.243281
Dnr9 | -.5548192 1.156174 -0.48 0.631 -2.820879 1.711241
Dpe9 | -1.080229 .5846352 -1.85 0.065 -2.226093 .065635
Dnr9 | 0 (omitted)
_cons | .006164 .0184596 0.33 0.738 -.0300162 .0423442
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
sigma_u | 0
sigma_e | .25039348
rho | 0 (fraction of variance due to u_i)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does anyone know how to remove this constant to get values for dummies?
Related Posts with Dummy trap(intercept) removal in stata
How do you combine categorical and numerical variables?How can I combine variables? These variables all refer to use of prescription benzodiazepines: val…
Fixed Effects High Prob F and low RsqHello everyone, After performing xtoverid and interpreting its results, I decided to run a fe robust…
Strate graphHi everyone, I would like to create a survival graph: a strate graph. I ask you if it is possible to…
Cloud computing Stata/BEDear all, I have a very big geocoded panel dataset of about 21 million observations or 4 million if…
Consecutive observations by mofdHello everyone, I am working with panel data and I would like to kindly ask you for some guidance. T…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Dummy trap(intercept) removal in stata
Post a Comment