Dear everyone,
I post this because I am confused with bilateral fixed effect estimates:
I estimate the effects of restrictions in services (logistics, banking and transport) on bilateral trade in food goods between 36 OECD countries from 2014-2018 (panel data).
My restrictiveness variables are bilateral and vary by sector and country, but no variation by year for some countries. My dependent variable is sectoral.
I estimate the fixed-effects model (exporter-sectors time, importer-sectors time, and exporter-importer-sector). As independent variables I have my bilateral restrictiveness measures by sector and the FTAij (Free Trade agreement). Through ppml_panel_sg and ppmlhdfe as controls my results are not at all significant.
Other effects when I use the ppml_panel_sg command, no pair with my invariant bilateral cost variables (common language, common border, bilateral distance), my variables become significant.
According to you, should I use the model with bilateral fixed effects or two-step method to construct bilateral trade costs?
Best regards.
Related Posts with ppmlhdfe in panels
Significant in one-way, but not in two-way ANOVAHey, I'm currently doing my data analysis for my thesis but I encountered a problem. The main effect…
log differenced model and GMM EstimatorHi all, I have panel data (T=30) and due to potential threat of non stationarity in my data i've tr…
Failing to convert .shp and .dbf dile to .dta formatHello, I'm trying to convert a gis file to .dta format. To answer a few questions: .shp and .dbf ar…
heterofactor and ML maximizationI am using the heterofactor command (https://www.stata-journal.com/articl...article=st0431), but it …
chnaging values of a variableDear Listers, I am using Stata 15.1. I am working with a dataset with more than a million observati…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to ppmlhdfe in panels
Post a Comment