Dear everyone,
I post this because I am confused with bilateral fixed effect estimates:
I estimate the effects of restrictions in services (logistics, banking and transport) on bilateral trade in food goods between 36 OECD countries from 2014-2018 (panel data).
My restrictiveness variables are bilateral and vary by sector and country, but no variation by year for some countries. My dependent variable is sectoral.
I estimate the fixed-effects model (exporter-sectors time, importer-sectors time, and exporter-importer-sector). As independent variables I have my bilateral restrictiveness measures by sector and the FTAij (Free Trade agreement). Through ppml_panel_sg and ppmlhdfe as controls my results are not at all significant.
Other effects when I use the ppml_panel_sg command, no pair with my invariant bilateral cost variables (common language, common border, bilateral distance), my variables become significant.
According to you, should I use the model with bilateral fixed effects or two-step method to construct bilateral trade costs?
Best regards.
Related Posts with ppmlhdfe in panels
FIML assumptionsHi all, I'm interested in using full information maximum likelihood estimation as a method for addr…
How to Conduct the Pre and Post Analysis?Dear all, I have panel data from 2015 to 2019, i want to check pre period 2015 and 2016 descriptive …
Multiple Bars with 95% CI barHi Statalist, I always appreciate for your help. I am struggling with the confidence interval bar i…
Quantile regression with pweights, cluster standard errors and strata fixed effectsHi! I need to run a cross-sectional quantile regression with pweights, strata fixed effects and clus…
How to Conduct the Pre and Post Analysis?Dear all, I have panel data from 2015 to 2019, i want to check pre period 2015 and 2016 descriptive …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to ppmlhdfe in panels
Post a Comment