Dear all,
I have a panel dataset organised by cell and quarter. My main regression is the following
xi: reghdfe y x1 x2 x3, a(cell quarter) vce(cluster cell quarter)
I want to include an additional fixed effect, namely a postcode fixed effect. Therefore, I did
xi: reghdfe y x1 x2 x3, a(cell postcode quarter) vce(cluster cell quarter)
For comparison, I also performed the following:
xi: reghdfe y x1 x2 x3 i.postcode, a(cell quarter) vce(cluster cell quarter).
I get the same coefficient, the same number of observations and R-squared. However, I got a different level of significance.
I was not expecting this. What could explain this difference in the level of significance and which one is the more correct approach?
Thank you!
Related Posts with Level of significance different with reghdfe
How to replace the age and exit at a certain ageDear All, Is there a way I can replace all age with the current age+1 till 2040 at one go and also …
Generate variable (maybe needs a loop)I have the following data set: Parent Subsidiary Variable Value US UK revenue 10 US FRA revenue 15 …
Standardization of time in panel data with different treatmentsHi everybody I am working with panel data and investigating how employees experience the transfer f…
When do I use GMM style instruments in a panel Vector Autoregression model?Dear all, I am applying a panel Vector Autoregression model using the command pvar from Abrigo and …
Mlabcolor, mlabsize, etc. not changing in scatter plot since Stata updateHello, I have been having a number of issues with my graphics in Stata (16, updated with every new …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Level of significance different with reghdfe
Post a Comment