Dear all,
I have a panel dataset organised by cell and quarter. My main regression is the following
xi: reghdfe y x1 x2 x3, a(cell quarter) vce(cluster cell quarter)
I want to include an additional fixed effect, namely a postcode fixed effect. Therefore, I did
xi: reghdfe y x1 x2 x3, a(cell postcode quarter) vce(cluster cell quarter)
For comparison, I also performed the following:
xi: reghdfe y x1 x2 x3 i.postcode, a(cell quarter) vce(cluster cell quarter).
I get the same coefficient, the same number of observations and R-squared. However, I got a different level of significance.
I was not expecting this. What could explain this difference in the level of significance and which one is the more correct approach?
Thank you!
Related Posts with Level of significance different with reghdfe
Problem with local macro in a graph titleI am trying to produce graphs with different titles by using local macros to store the desired title…
Numbers exported to Excel with more decimalsHello everyone: Iam exporting a dta. from Stata to Excel, I have a variable like this gen total_mea…
Coding for xtabond2Hi all, I am fairly new to -xtabond2- command and I have some questions regarding the way for codin…
How to test heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation in SYS-GMM?How can I test heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation in SYS-GMM (xtfdpdsys) ? …
Rsquared after svy:probitcan i get pseudo R squared value for svy:probit? I have searched and got two ways: 1. using the -p…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Level of significance different with reghdfe
Post a Comment