Dear all,
I have a panel dataset organised by cell and quarter. My main regression is the following
xi: reghdfe y x1 x2 x3, a(cell quarter) vce(cluster cell quarter)
I want to include an additional fixed effect, namely a postcode fixed effect. Therefore, I did
xi: reghdfe y x1 x2 x3, a(cell postcode quarter) vce(cluster cell quarter)
For comparison, I also performed the following:
xi: reghdfe y x1 x2 x3 i.postcode, a(cell quarter) vce(cluster cell quarter).
I get the same coefficient, the same number of observations and R-squared. However, I got a different level of significance.
I was not expecting this. What could explain this difference in the level of significance and which one is the more correct approach?
Thank you!
Related Posts with Level of significance different with reghdfe
All Observations are Duplicates - Panel Data r(451) Repeated Time Variables within panelHello, Using Stata 12, I have a panel dataset from 2010 to 2019 with 23 variables and 1484908 obser…
Dependent variable comes in months, how to build model?I am studying the determinants of unemployment spells. My dependent variable is unemployment spell (…
Too many observations for gen id = _nI am using a very large dataset and this technique for generating a unique id for each observation d…
Analytical weight in a count model with an exogenous treatmentHello, I have a quick question regarding weights in 'teffects'. Could you please point me towards t…
How do i compute the geometric increase rate of a variable in a panel dataset?Hello everyone, I'm new to Stata and this forum. If I do something wrong, please tell me. I would li…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Level of significance different with reghdfe
Post a Comment