Dear all,
I have a panel dataset organised by cell and quarter. My main regression is the following
xi: reghdfe y x1 x2 x3, a(cell quarter) vce(cluster cell quarter)
I want to include an additional fixed effect, namely a postcode fixed effect. Therefore, I did
xi: reghdfe y x1 x2 x3, a(cell postcode quarter) vce(cluster cell quarter)
For comparison, I also performed the following:
xi: reghdfe y x1 x2 x3 i.postcode, a(cell quarter) vce(cluster cell quarter).
I get the same coefficient, the same number of observations and R-squared. However, I got a different level of significance.
I was not expecting this. What could explain this difference in the level of significance and which one is the more correct approach?
Thank you!
Related Posts with Level of significance different with reghdfe
Loop to open, keep variables, and join different filesHello, I am struggling with the following task that already kept me bugging for hours. This is the…
Piecewise Regression with a median as a knotDear Stata Users My data is in panle format (firm, time). I need to estimate piesewise linear regre…
Saving multiple Excel files as Stata filesIn "C:\Users\budug\OneDrive\Documents\School\Projects ", I have a few Excel files, namely data_2004,…
Whether to control for a certain factorHi, I am trying to estimate the effect of different types of managerial incentives (autonomy, perfor…
Shaded area xtline graphDear Statalisters, Currently I am working on a panel dataset where my probit model predicts either …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Level of significance different with reghdfe
Post a Comment