Hello everyone,
I am estimating a cross-country IV regression that uses internal instruments which exploit the presence of heteroskedasticity in the model’s residuals. My variables of interest are bank credit and bank credit^2(squared). I want to find the point estimate where the effect of bank credit on economic growth becomes negative (e.g. when bank credit reaches 90% of GDP). I tried nlcom command but it does work with it. Can somebody recommend me another option?
Note: Bank credit is measured as total credit extended to the private sector divided with GDP
ivreg2h gr linitial log_infl log_trade log_govsize log_school ( prcreditB prcreditB2=) , gmm2s robust
Too few excluded instruments: standard IV model not estimable
IV with Generated Instruments only
Instruments created from Z:
linitial log_infl log_trade log_govsize log_school
2-Step GMM estimation
---------------------
Estimates efficient for arbitrary heteroskedasticity
Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity
Number of obs = 83
F( 7, 75) = 18.74
Prob > F = 0.0000
Total (centered) SS = 156.8713703 Centered R2 = 0.4629
Total (uncentered) SS = 537.6248214 Uncentered R2 = 0.8433
Residual SS = 84.26147015 Root MSE = 1.008
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
gr | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
prcreditB | 6.83556 1.817279 3.76 0.000 3.273759 10.39736
prcreditB2 | -3.64533 .8717815 -4.18 0.000 -5.35399 -1.936669
linitial | -1.001398 .1821731 -5.50 0.000 -1.358451 -.6443452
log_infl | .0567211 .1284435 0.44 0.659 -.1950236 .3084658
log_trade | .3784561 .1323573 2.86 0.004 .1190405 .6378717
log_govsize | -.9833192 .3495389 -2.81 0.005 -1.668403 -.2982355
log_school | 1.779788 .4935776 3.61 0.000 .8123935 2.747182
_cons | 6.083197 .9213752 6.60 0.000 4.277335 7.889059
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Underidentification test (Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic): 17.347
Chi-sq(9) P-val = 0.0435
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 3.441
(Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic): 6.071
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 5% maximal IV relative bias 18.76
10% maximal IV relative bias 10.58
20% maximal IV relative bias 6.23
30% maximal IV relative bias 4.66
10% maximal IV size 29.32
15% maximal IV size 16.16
20% maximal IV size 11.65
25% maximal IV size 9.31
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
NB: Critical values are for Cragg-Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 12.227
Chi-sq(8) P-val = 0.1414
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instrumented: prcreditB prcreditB2
Included instruments: linitial log_infl log_trade log_govsize log_school
Excluded instruments: prcreditB_linitial_g prcreditB_log_infl_g
prcreditB_log_trade_g prcreditB_log_govsize_g
prcreditB_log_school_g prcreditB2_linitial_g
prcreditB2_log_infl_g prcreditB2_log_trade_g
prcreditB2_log_govsize_g prcreditB2_log_school_g
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related Posts with Finding the threshold for the concave relationship
Matching firms based on size, performance and market-to-book ratioDear all, I am currently writing a code to capture the differences in earnings management between U…
Pooled logit with Clustered standard errors a substitute for a panel model with high variation of panelid?By exploring my dataset, I noticed great Variation among my Groups of the panelid. I thus want to kn…
Display full, unabbreviated variable names in data editorHow do we display full variable names in data browser? My variable names are very long and most of t…
Standardised rates for hospitalization in case of multiple admissionsHelo every one, I am new here and have just a general question. Is there a method for calcultation…
interaction termsDear Statalisters, When we are checking for interactions in cox regression, what is the difference …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Finding the threshold for the concave relationship
Post a Comment