By exploring my dataset, I noticed great Variation among my Groups of the panelid. I thus want to know if this alone justifies to run a fixed effects model to Control for all the heterogeneity of my panelid or if a pooled model or random effects model with clustered Standard Errors, which tells Stata that the observations are correlated within the Group, will also account for the heterogeneity as much?
Related Posts with Pooled logit with Clustered standard errors a substitute for a panel model with high variation of panelid?
estimating dynamic panel data models when the data set features a moderate N and moderate T.What are the methods of estimation that can be used when the data set features a moderate N and mode…
Dtalink: Coditioning probability matchingHi, I am currently using the Stata dtalink-package in order to match data from two sources. As I cr…
Help replacing individual data from household data, using macros over variable names.Hi there, I have only recently started using Stata to edit data, instead of using the default datas…
Why do I get different results for fe and gmm2s estimation using (xt)ivreg2?Dear Statalisters, I am trying to analyze the relationship between corruption and the distribution …
Why do I get different results for fe and gmm2s estimation using (xt)ivreg2?Dear Statalisters, I am trying to analyze the relationship between corruption and the distribution …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Pooled logit with Clustered standard errors a substitute for a panel model with high variation of panelid?
Post a Comment