Hello everyone,
I am running a panel data regression model in which I observe 4 time periods and 66 observations, using a fixed effects regression and I am currently including the I.year variable to control for year fixed effects. However when I run the regression without i.year, results vary significantly and coefficients that were statistically insignificant now become significant. I ran a testparm i.Year test in order to see if there was need to include the i.Year variable and the results demonstrated that yes. I was just wondering if there was any reasons why I would not include them or if it Is always wise to include i.year?
Many thanks
Pepito
Related Posts with Year fixed effects
Add Cohen's d effect size to esttab t-test tableHi Everyone, I am trying to create a (Latex) table in which I compare the means of two different su…
Major update to -moremata-A new version of -moremata- is available from SSC. Type Code: . ssc install moremata, replace to i…
Identify value label names and storing in macroDear All, I have a dataset imported into STATA. While importing, variable names get changed to lowe…
Interpretation formulas of Poisson regression coefficient formula for percentages and logsDear Statalist members, I have done a Poisson fixed effects panel regression (Stata 13) regressing …
Update and paper on -reldist-The -reldist- package (relative distribution analysis) has been updated on SSC. Type Code: . ssc i…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Year fixed effects
Post a Comment