Hi guys,
I am looking into the effect of inequality on economic growth using panel estimation.
When I include gini^2 in my regression as well as gini, the coefficient on gini becomes significant but without including the squared term it is extremely insignificant.
Regression: gdpgrowth = gini + gini^2 + educ variable + dummy variables... etc
The gini coefficient is positive but the gini^2 is negative. I understand that this means the relationship can be represented by an inverted U-shape (i.e inequality has positive effect with low levels of gdpgrowth but negative at higher levels)
BUT i don't understand why including gini^2 drastically changes the significance of the results???
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Related Posts with Independent variable becomes significant when i include its squared value in regression
Nested foreach and forvalue for fixed effect analysis (using xtreg), with saving outputsHi, I am completely new to STATALIST, STATA and some "decent" econometrics, in general. Therefore, …
comparing Sem and Gsem with their AICHello, I wanted to know if it is possible to compare a sem model with a gsem model by their AIC ? I …
Update to -moremata- available from SSCTo install the update, type Code: . ssc install moremata, replace or use the adoupdate command. T…
Major update to -kmatch- now available from SSCA major update to kmatch is now available from SSC. To install the update, type Code: . ssc instal…
Vuong (1989) LR testsHi I am running a test whereby I sequentially add a group of fixed effects indicators (eg client fix…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Independent variable becomes significant when i include its squared value in regression
Post a Comment