Hi guys,
I am looking into the effect of inequality on economic growth using panel estimation.
When I include gini^2 in my regression as well as gini, the coefficient on gini becomes significant but without including the squared term it is extremely insignificant.
Regression: gdpgrowth = gini + gini^2 + educ variable + dummy variables... etc
The gini coefficient is positive but the gini^2 is negative. I understand that this means the relationship can be represented by an inverted U-shape (i.e inequality has positive effect with low levels of gdpgrowth but negative at higher levels)
BUT i don't understand why including gini^2 drastically changes the significance of the results???
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Related Posts with Independent variable becomes significant when i include its squared value in regression
Squared and linear term are both insignificantHello fellow Stata users, I'm encoutering some problems with potential non-linearity in a random ef…
Creating Control Variable using IPUMS CPSHey guys, I am currently trying to do a regression with panel data from the IPUMS CPS. I have mostl…
Max function doesn't return the exact resultHello, I have a problem with the max() function. I have a dataset with several variables and one of…
Estimating propensity scores after multiple imputationHi there, I am estimating propensity scores using logistic regression on an imputed dataset (M=10).…
Matched data for regressionI am new to STATA. I am working on DHS dataset. I have merged the men recode file with the individua…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Independent variable becomes significant when i include its squared value in regression
Post a Comment