Hi guys,
I am looking into the effect of inequality on economic growth using panel estimation.
When I include gini^2 in my regression as well as gini, the coefficient on gini becomes significant but without including the squared term it is extremely insignificant.
Regression: gdpgrowth = gini + gini^2 + educ variable + dummy variables... etc
The gini coefficient is positive but the gini^2 is negative. I understand that this means the relationship can be represented by an inverted U-shape (i.e inequality has positive effect with low levels of gdpgrowth but negative at higher levels)
BUT i don't understand why including gini^2 drastically changes the significance of the results???
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Related Posts with Independent variable becomes significant when i include its squared value in regression
To both experienced Stata programmers, and Stata users: How do you prefer to have the command, as a post estimation or as a prefix?Good afternoon, I have written a command to estimate robust variance post Seemingly Unrelated Regre…
Direction of bias?Dear all, I am trying to determine directions of biased (upward or downward) estimates in my study …
Aidsills with market fixed effectsDear Statalisters, I am using Stata ver 14, and the built in command aidsills written by Lecocq and…
can i use mi chained logistic and how to weight respondentsi have combined survey data sets from 32 countries and have about 90k respondents, the number of res…
Lagged variables of daily dataHi, I have a dataset of stock returns, with daily returns (panel). I have successfully created runn…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Independent variable becomes significant when i include its squared value in regression
Post a Comment