Hi guys,
I am looking into the effect of inequality on economic growth using panel estimation.
When I include gini^2 in my regression as well as gini, the coefficient on gini becomes significant but without including the squared term it is extremely insignificant.
Regression: gdpgrowth = gini + gini^2 + educ variable + dummy variables... etc
The gini coefficient is positive but the gini^2 is negative. I understand that this means the relationship can be represented by an inverted U-shape (i.e inequality has positive effect with low levels of gdpgrowth but negative at higher levels)
BUT i don't understand why including gini^2 drastically changes the significance of the results???
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Related Posts with Independent variable becomes significant when i include its squared value in regression
Dropping group of variables if the group does not contain a certain valueDear all, I am a stata beginner so this question might sound stupid. I have a dataset that list per…
Panel data - removing individuals if criteria is not met in each yearHi. I have panel data from 2009-2016. I want to remove individuals from the data set if the variable…
Hausman Test issue: difference = 0 for every regressorI am dealing with panel data on 19 UK industries from 1997 to 2018. To test which estimator is most …
IVtobit marginal effectsDear Listers, I am trying to estimate the marginal effects after running ivtobit. The following cod…
How to generate a variable that uses other variables when I have missing valuesI am trying to generate a variable (CSSD) for dispersion which is equal to the sum of the squared de…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Independent variable becomes significant when i include its squared value in regression
Post a Comment