I am trying to decompose (using Ben Jann’s nldecompose) differences in the probability of having more liberal gender views into differences in characteristics (cohort replacement) and differences in coefficients (intra-cohort change).
The commands and output are as follows:
Code:
. nldecompose, by(Period): logit ideology1 Age [pweight=weight] Number of obs (A) = 1872 Number of obs (B) = 1403 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Results | Coef. Percentage --------------+--------------------------------------------------------------- Omega = 1 | Char | -.0078933 7.860032% Coef | -.0925304 92.13997% --------------+--------------------------------------------------------------- Omega = 0 | Char | -.0064641 6.436787% Coef | -.0939597 93.56321% --------------+--------------------------------------------------------------- Raw | -.1004237 100% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .
1.What is the difference or justification for using twofold over threefold? I understand the difference between them but not when to use each one (i.e. in twofold you are saying that if the observed variables have the same effect in each period, then it would explain x% of observed disparity in gender views – in threefold you add disparity in returns of these observed variables)
2. In a number of academic papers I have read which use nldecompose, the authors have decomposed change into:
- Differences attributable to observable characteristics (“Char”)
- Differences not attributable to observable characteristics (“Coef)
- Total difference
For example in:
Arndt, B.J., 2017. Explaining Income-Related Disparities in Pap Smear Utilization: A regression-based decomposition analysis of differences in Pap smear utilization following implementation of the Affordable Care Act (No. 1694-2017-5829). – TABLE A3
Kelly, E., McGuinness, S., O’connell, P.J., Haugh, D. and Pandiella, A.G., 2014. Transitions in and out of unemployment among young people in the Irish recession. Comparative Economic Studies, 56(4), pp.616-634. – TABLE 7
An example of my data:
Code:
* Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input byte(Period ideology1) int Age 0 1 43 0 1 48 1 1 34 1 1 24 0 0 27 1 1 24 0 0 32 1 1 36 1 0 38 1 1 38 0 1 71 0 1 39 0 0 60 0 1 25 0 1 56 0 1 51 0 0 34 0 1 19 0 1 70 0 1 62 0 1 36 1 0 45 1 1 27 1 1 16 0 1 37 1 1 38 0 1 30 1 1 52 0 1 38 1 1 17 0 1 58 0 1 42 0 1 16 0 1 41 0 1 47 0 1 41 0 1 16 0 1 40 0 1 33 0 0 51 0 1 44 0 1 53 0 0 36 0 0 58 0 1 65 0 0 52 0 1 17 0 1 20 0 1 44 0 0 38 0 1 47 0 1 65 0 1 41 0 1 41 0 1 19 0 0 56 0 1 58 0 1 50 0 1 65 0 1 51 0 1 32 0 1 18 0 1 38 0 0 51 0 0 56 0 0 77 0 0 31 0 1 40 0 1 49 0 0 53 0 1 40 0 0 63 0 0 43 0 1 51 0 1 52 0 1 49 0 1 60 0 1 36 0 1 35 0 1 76 0 1 36 0 1 46 0 1 69 0 1 55 0 0 35 0 1 25 0 1 46 0 1 60 0 0 38 0 0 50 0 1 16 0 1 62 0 1 18 0 0 35 0 1 31 0 0 73 0 1 68 0 1 50 0 1 60 0 1 33 end label values Period per label def per 0 "1999-2004", modify label def per 1 "2005-2009", modify label values ideology1 edc label def edc 0 "Agree", modify label def edc 1 "Disagree", modify label values Age X003
0 Response to Oaxaca decomposition for nonlinear regression (nldecompose)
Post a Comment