In ivreghdfe and reghdfe, although it's fast to just absorb fixed effects, if I add them into absorb(), they are not calculated into R^2. Only when I include fixed effects as i.FE, they are included in R^2. So when I just absorb them, it appears as if R^2 is very small when it is actually large.
Is there any way to put fixed effect into absorb() so that the speed is fast, while at the same time calculate R^2 including those fixed effects?
Related Posts with Full calculation of R^2 when using ivreghdfe and reghdfe
Python in StataDear all, I have a question about Python and Stata in version 16. I checked the documentation and ma…
Mediation Analysis with multiple control variables and bootstrap CIsDear Statalist, after intensive studying of the available resources online, I am still left with so…
List of localsHi Statalist! I need to make a list of some locals defined in the .do file, in order to verify if t…
GMM Panel Data on StataHi, I have a dynamic model where the dependent variable is lagged. Therefore I am using system-GMM a…
Using loops and assigning particular rules to eachDear Stata list, I am agonising over a problem and would very much appreciate your support. I have …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Full calculation of R^2 when using ivreghdfe and reghdfe
Post a Comment