In ivreghdfe and reghdfe, although it's fast to just absorb fixed effects, if I add them into absorb(), they are not calculated into R^2. Only when I include fixed effects as i.FE, they are included in R^2. So when I just absorb them, it appears as if R^2 is very small when it is actually large.
Is there any way to put fixed effect into absorb() so that the speed is fast, while at the same time calculate R^2 including those fixed effects?
Related Posts with Full calculation of R^2 when using ivreghdfe and reghdfe
Cross-sectional dependence testWhen I perform the cross-sectional dependence test on each of my variables separately, I get the sam…
Xtabond2 command for system GMM. Please help me with the coding!Dear all, I am studying the relationship between Economic growth and FDI inflow. Due to the endogen…
Conditioning on a string variableHi, I'm new to Stata and would like to know how to condition on a string variable. I have a variable…
Do we need to test for any additional parallel trend when using triple difference?A very common assumption of DiD is parallel pre-trend satisfaction. And when we subsample, we need t…
CRS Input-oriented Two-stage DEA ModelDear Statalist members, I have been trying to implement CRS Input-oriented Two-stage DEA Modelin my…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Full calculation of R^2 when using ivreghdfe and reghdfe
Post a Comment