In ivreghdfe and reghdfe, although it's fast to just absorb fixed effects, if I add them into absorb(), they are not calculated into R^2. Only when I include fixed effects as i.FE, they are included in R^2. So when I just absorb them, it appears as if R^2 is very small when it is actually large.
Is there any way to put fixed effect into absorb() so that the speed is fast, while at the same time calculate R^2 including those fixed effects?
Related Posts with Full calculation of R^2 when using ivreghdfe and reghdfe
Unexpected error from XTPMG outputHi dear all. I am having an unexpected error message from xtpmg output. I am using Stata 16 for Mac…
Pooled panel Heckman MLE vs. pooled panel Heckman Two-stepDear Statalist, I am running a pooled panel Heckman two-step estimation to find determinants of ins…
Weighting data with AIPW and teffectsHello everyone, Actually, I try to understand how to use an IPW estimator. I have 11 treatments var…
calculating or identifying start/stop dates according to a rule with consecutive observationsHi, this is a snap shot of my data set. Code: Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install:…
if & else if syntaxDear Stata users, I wrote a very simple program to caculate efficacy coefficient. The program is as…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Full calculation of R^2 when using ivreghdfe and reghdfe
Post a Comment