I was having trouble getting a multiple indicators, multiple causes model to converge, so I simplified it to sem(X <- a b c) (X->d), which is the same as regr d a b c. The sem model still would not converge. It would produce the same parameters as the regr, after about 20 iterations, but would not converge. The log-likelihood from the regr and the sem were also much different. It seems like they should be the same. Any insights about what is going on and how to get the sem to converge (so I can then get back to the complete MIMC model) ? Thanks.
Related Posts with Convergence in SEM
Overlay Keys in LegendI am graphing point estimates and confidence intervals for two different groups. In the legend, I wo…
Stata implementation of Delaunay triangulation + Voronoi tessellation + convex hullDear all, I have been working on a native implementation of Delaunay triangulation, Voronoi tessell…
Margins after reghdfe?Hello Statalisters,. I am running a triple differences linear probability regression, where I am ev…
Parse multiple selectors once using insheetjsonHi all, I am trying to build a program that gets data from Statistics Denmark's API using insheetjs…
Automatically parse selectors with insheetjsonHi all, I am trying to build a program that gets data from Statistics Denmark's API using insheetjs…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Convergence in SEM
Post a Comment