I was having trouble getting a multiple indicators, multiple causes model to converge, so I simplified it to sem(X <- a b c) (X->d), which is the same as regr d a b c. The sem model still would not converge. It would produce the same parameters as the regr, after about 20 iterations, but would not converge. The log-likelihood from the regr and the sem were also much different. It seems like they should be the same. Any insights about what is going on and how to get the sem to converge (so I can then get back to the complete MIMC model) ? Thanks.
Related Posts with Convergence in SEM
R squared equals 1 when running spatial fixed effectsHello everyone, I´ve been asked to show that, when you run your outcome variable against your geogr…
Bankcountryyear fixed effectsDear all, could you please kindly confirm, that the following code would mean "bankcountryyear" fix…
Cell Extraction and reading data Hello, I have an extraction issue in Stata. I want to extract a specific cell from Stata data base…
Help with Using Lincom Command on Interaction TermDear all, I am using Stata 16, on mac. I used the following command to estimate my regression: regr…
t statistic (p-value) of lower order coefficients in models with interaction termsHi, In the following system GMM model based on a panel dataset of 1696 firms across 16 years, I am …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Convergence in SEM
Post a Comment