Dear all,
I am doing a two-fold Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition in Stata using -oaxaca- command written by Ben Jann (2008, Stata Journal). I am interested in 'detailed' results. I find that controbutions of some varaibles are statistically insignificant. This happens both in the explained part and in the explained part. Should I take those variables into account when interpreting decomposition results? In some cases the contributions are large relative to the gap, but they are insignificant.
Thank you!
Aleksey
Related Posts with Oaxaca decomposition:interpretation of insignificant contributions
Creating a new variable in panel data that meets multiple conditions- Replace numeric characters with letters within a string
- Predicted Probabilities in CMP for multinomial probits don't sum to 1?
- Is there a way to increase the number of characters shown when tabulating categorical variables?
- Confidence interval
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Oaxaca decomposition:interpretation of insignificant contributions
Post a Comment