Dear all,
I am doing a two-fold Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition in Stata using -oaxaca- command written by Ben Jann (2008, Stata Journal). I am interested in 'detailed' results. I find that controbutions of some varaibles are statistically insignificant. This happens both in the explained part and in the explained part. Should I take those variables into account when interpreting decomposition results? In some cases the contributions are large relative to the gap, but they are insignificant.
Thank you!
Aleksey
Related Posts with Oaxaca decomposition:interpretation of insignificant contributions
Create variables from a categorical variableI have a variable with many categories and want to create new variables for each one. Is there a way…
key-value formatHi, in IMHO, currently biggest Stata´s flaw, in data management area, is the native "lack" of suppo…
Formulas of the regs' standard errorsWhere can I find the formulas that the different vce() in the reg command use? The help file does no…
Appending datasets of different shapesHi, I have datasets from 3 surveys with the first one containing variables like unique ID, age, BMI…
Merging_adviseHi statalist community, I need some help with merging File A has a unique ID File B has a unique I…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Oaxaca decomposition:interpretation of insignificant contributions
Post a Comment