Dear all,
I am doing a two-fold Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition in Stata using -oaxaca- command written by Ben Jann (2008, Stata Journal). I am interested in 'detailed' results. I find that controbutions of some varaibles are statistically insignificant. This happens both in the explained part and in the explained part. Should I take those variables into account when interpreting decomposition results? In some cases the contributions are large relative to the gap, but they are insignificant.
Thank you!
Aleksey
Related Posts with Oaxaca decomposition:interpretation of insignificant contributions
Reshape large panel data set with multiple variables and daily dataHi members, I have a large data set with information about 166 bonds, their characteristics, follow…
Oaxaca decomposition:interpretation of insignificant contributionsDear all, I am doing a two-fold Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition in Stata using -oaxaca- command writte…
Flag id's that have a tag==0I have a maternity dataset, where each mother has a record per pregnancy. I want to do two things: 1…
Meta-Analysis - how to compare 2 Effects: "The effect of A on C is stronger than the effect of B on C."Dear Stata Professionals, i have a question on a meta-analysis problem. I have 38 studies on which…
Overlay Dot ChartsHello! I have a relatively simple question that I have searched the forum for but could use extra a…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Oaxaca decomposition:interpretation of insignificant contributions
Post a Comment