Dear all,
I am doing a two-fold Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition in Stata using -oaxaca- command written by Ben Jann (2008, Stata Journal). I am interested in 'detailed' results. I find that controbutions of some varaibles are statistically insignificant. This happens both in the explained part and in the explained part. Should I take those variables into account when interpreting decomposition results? In some cases the contributions are large relative to the gap, but they are insignificant.
Thank you!
Aleksey
Related Posts with Oaxaca decomposition:interpretation of insignificant contributions
Baseline hazard function for Piecewise constant modelI need to plot baseline hazard functions for a piecewise constant model. The problem I find is that …
Simple question on asdoc and label lengthsHi all, I am using asdoc to export some simple summary stats to word, using labels as variable name…
Generating variable based on two groupsHello, I'm working with a dataset from Comtrade, which include information about import, export and…
Ranking in descending order Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input int(clientid part…
Variable labels and frmttableI am using frmttable to generate a summary table. As far as I can see the option varlabels should au…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Oaxaca decomposition:interpretation of insignificant contributions
Post a Comment