I am currently analysing a Log-Lin model, in which I am adding the independent variable LN Pop to test the significance within the regression model.
The regression output within stata states the p value > 0.05 significance level, therefore i do not reject the Null hypothesis, implying LN Pop has significance.
However the stata output for the lincom command regarding LN DPI and LN POP where DPI is consumers real income = total personal expenditure + real savings) provides a p value of 0.000.
The Null hypothesis i am testing is: Ho = LogPop + Beta y (income elasticity) = 1
The stata output states i should reject the Null, with Population having no significance, I am asking for help on how population can both be significant and insignificant and what is the implication of this? whether further regression is needed using per capita variations rather than aggregate.
Apologies for any confusion in the question, I am new and unfamiliar to stata and econometric regression, any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
J
Related Posts with Population Variable Signifcance
Interpretation of user-written khb program output, reduced OR-full OR != diff ORI'm using the user-written package khb in Stata15 on Windows 10. My data are sensitive and cannot be…
Programming a loop for non-time series datasetDear all, I turn to you for advice once again, as I am working for the first time on a dataset that…
t-test on coefficient of probit regressionHello there, I'm trying to find the impact of contingencies on an explanatory variable in a probit r…
Stratified analysis or statistical measures of co-linearityHello, I have a sample of 1239 participants. My exposure variable is binary (1 = yes, 0 = no), and …
Market shares after mixlogitDear all, Does anyone know how can the market shares after a mixlogit model, including price, be est…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Population Variable Signifcance
Post a Comment