I am currently analysing a Log-Lin model, in which I am adding the independent variable LN Pop to test the significance within the regression model.
The regression output within stata states the p value > 0.05 significance level, therefore i do not reject the Null hypothesis, implying LN Pop has significance.
However the stata output for the lincom command regarding LN DPI and LN POP where DPI is consumers real income = total personal expenditure + real savings) provides a p value of 0.000.
The Null hypothesis i am testing is: Ho = LogPop + Beta y (income elasticity) = 1
The stata output states i should reject the Null, with Population having no significance, I am asking for help on how population can both be significant and insignificant and what is the implication of this? whether further regression is needed using per capita variations rather than aggregate.
Apologies for any confusion in the question, I am new and unfamiliar to stata and econometric regression, any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
J
Related Posts with Population Variable Signifcance
re-formulate a functionHello everyone, I have this equation Code: g=exp(1.546776)*(x/(1-x)^(0.4314782)*y^(1-0.4314782)-exp…
Adding fixed effects in esttab using estaddHi all, I've run a few regressions and am trying to add rows indicating the presence of fixed effec…
Interpreting stata output with log dependent variable and % independent variablesHello stata users, Hope you are doing well. I have a question regarding interpreting stata output i…
Using substring functions in Stata 16.1Dear Statalist, I have a string variable "comment" stored as "strL" that contains a mix of numbers…
Graphing Medians Panel DataHello, I'd like to graph the median values of a variable. The data I have looks like this, and I wou…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Population Variable Signifcance
Post a Comment