I am currently analysing a Log-Lin model, in which I am adding the independent variable LN Pop to test the significance within the regression model.
The regression output within stata states the p value > 0.05 significance level, therefore i do not reject the Null hypothesis, implying LN Pop has significance.
However the stata output for the lincom command regarding LN DPI and LN POP where DPI is consumers real income = total personal expenditure + real savings) provides a p value of 0.000.
The Null hypothesis i am testing is: Ho = LogPop + Beta y (income elasticity) = 1
The stata output states i should reject the Null, with Population having no significance, I am asking for help on how population can both be significant and insignificant and what is the implication of this? whether further regression is needed using per capita variations rather than aggregate.
Apologies for any confusion in the question, I am new and unfamiliar to stata and econometric regression, any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
J
Related Posts with Population Variable Signifcance
Create a new shared_border variableHi everyone, I am replicating a study. In the original study, the authors compare firms located in a…
Double Machine Learning (DML) in STATA (xporegress command)Dear all, I am trying to use the command that STATA has for DML (Cross-fit partialing-out lasso lin…
rfdist in metan does not workHello, I'm currently on a set of data and conducting a meta-analysis with metan. For the results I …
times series data mergeHi I have 2 files that I want to merge and I want to create time-series data. I have one file with…
Modelling wind direction and fire spreadI'm interested in finding whether wind direction is a good predictor of the direction of fire spread…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Population Variable Signifcance
Post a Comment