Suppose I have two regressors, task availability (Xa) and task participation (Xp), and a DV Y. One can only participate in a task if it is available, but one can choose not to participate even if a task is available. Baseline model Y ~ Xa, should be the total effect of task availability. Y ~ Xa + Xa * Xp, adds the effect of participation. Now, if the interaction model is the true model, would Y ~ Xa be biased, because of omitted variable problem? That is, the total effect cannot be estimated using the baseline model?
Related Posts with Interpreting main effects model with omitted interaction terms
CRS Input-oriented Two-stage DEA ModelDear Statalist members, I have been trying to implement CRS Input-oriented Two-stage DEA Modelin my…
Conditioning on a string variableHi, I'm new to Stata and would like to know how to condition on a string variable. I have a variable…
Xtabond2 command for system GMM. Please help me with the coding!Dear all, I am studying the relationship between Economic growth and FDI inflow. Due to the endogen…
Cross-sectional dependence testWhen I perform the cross-sectional dependence test on each of my variables separately, I get the sam…
Do we need to test for any additional parallel trend when using triple difference?A very common assumption of DiD is parallel pre-trend satisfaction. And when we subsample, we need t…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting main effects model with omitted interaction terms
Post a Comment