Suppose I have two regressors, task availability (Xa) and task participation (Xp), and a DV Y. One can only participate in a task if it is available, but one can choose not to participate even if a task is available. Baseline model Y ~ Xa, should be the total effect of task availability. Y ~ Xa + Xa * Xp, adds the effect of participation. Now, if the interaction model is the true model, would Y ~ Xa be biased, because of omitted variable problem? That is, the total effect cannot be estimated using the baseline model?
Related Posts with Interpreting main effects model with omitted interaction terms
Admetan: edit graphHi, Does anyone know how to manipulate the confidence interval in the graph? I would like to have a…
PLOGIT ado file not foundDear Statalist friends, Does anyone has the plogit & plsearch ado files? It seems that both are…
Probit ModelHi! I am conducting a study. This is about household switching to HD services. I have 380 respondent…
Skewness Kurtosis normality testHi I carried out sktest of normality and results are as follows Skewness/Kurtosis tests for Normal…
Scalar operation returns inadvertent resultDear Statalist, I have a weird situation. While doing some estimations I generate certain scalars ba…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting main effects model with omitted interaction terms
Post a Comment