Suppose I have two regressors, task availability (Xa) and task participation (Xp), and a DV Y. One can only participate in a task if it is available, but one can choose not to participate even if a task is available. Baseline model Y ~ Xa, should be the total effect of task availability. Y ~ Xa + Xa * Xp, adds the effect of participation. Now, if the interaction model is the true model, would Y ~ Xa be biased, because of omitted variable problem? That is, the total effect cannot be estimated using the baseline model?
Related Posts with Interpreting main effects model with omitted interaction terms
putexcelHi everyone, I am trying to export the output of the below command into excel such that nonnative, y…
Computing predicted values and confidence intervals from ologit modelHi all, I have a dataset with information on employees from a firm. The dependent variable is “Prom…
Running regressions in loop and storing resultsHello! The example of my data is provided below. My goal is to run a series of simple regressions f…
Looping over levelsof 4 categorical numbered variablesHello, I have a dataset with approximately 20,000 observations. 4 variables of current interest are…
Betta coefficient changingDear all as you can see below the beta coefficients if leasehold change when adding a variable. How …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting main effects model with omitted interaction terms
Post a Comment