I am trying to plot a number of graphs using the ascending and stairstep connect styles of the connect option. My data is sorted by id and x. The command
. twoway (line y x, connect(ascending stairstep))
ignores the stairstep connect style, while the command
. twoway (line y x, connect( stairstep ascending))
ignores the ascending option. Neither command generates an error message. The help file appears to indicate that I can include multiple styles in my connect option. Is this a bug or am I misreading the help file?
Ultimately, I would like to plot a large number of curves on a single graph. I could issue commands like
. twoway (line y x if id==1, connect( stairstep)) (line y x if id==2, connect( stairstep))
Is this the optimal way of getting what I want? I could build up this command using a local macro. Are there any limits to the size of a twoway graph command? If I wanted to plot graphs from 1000 bootstraps, would this approach work?
Related Posts with Bug in the connect option of twoway graph?
Update to -robreg- available from SSCThanks to Kit Baum, an update to the -robreg- package is available from SSC. To install the update, …
Update to -moremata- available from SSCThanks to Kit Baum, an update to the -moremata- package is available from SSC. To install the update…
Rolling Regression to Calculate Abnormal ReturnsHi there, I used the rolling regression with window 12 months to calculate expected Beta and then I …
an error occurred when bootstrap executed savemarginsHi, Using the code below, I have been able to obtain predicted probability at age=0 and SRH_B=0. Als…
Surviving Firms in the SampleHi, I require some help with identifying the surviving firms that have survived completely over some…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Bug in the connect option of twoway graph?
Post a Comment