Hello All! I am currently writing my Bachelor’s Thesis and have a question about the interpretation of an interaction term in a log-linear model.
Without an interaction I’d take the coefficient of a x variable and transform it via exp(coefficient)-1 * 100. Then I am able to argue: A 1 unit increase in X is associated with a increase of … percent in Y. The coefficients are just very high (<0.3) That's why I applied the transformation.
Now I want to do that with the coefficient of an interaction term with a continuous and a binary variable. Binary variable is male/female and I want to be able to argue:
A 1 unit increase in the male sample is associated with an increase in variable Y by …percent.
A 1 unit increase in the female sample is associated with an increase in variable Y by …percent.
Is it correct to use the Stata command margins, dydx(continuous variable) at (dummy_variable=(0 1)) and then transform the output for each value of the dummy (0 1) via exp(coefficient)-1 * 100 ?
I would appreciate any help!
Related Posts with Interaction Term in Log-Linear Model
Collinarity in Fracreg analysis and collin commandDear statalisters, I am writing you because I am using fractional logistic regressions for my analy…
Error with levelsof but not levels commandHi everyone, Has anyone experienced errors with levelsof not present with levels commands? This curi…
how to calculate cumulative observation for a certain time interval, like 10 years?Hi Guys: i am new here. I have a dataset that records two states and if they had militarized dispute…
Exporting sts list data?Hi, Does anyone know how to export sts list data using putdocx or other means -- without having to …
How to loop over a merge of inconsistent variables over timeDear StataList. I need to merge two sets of data (partner + respondent) per wave for many waves. Th…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interaction Term in Log-Linear Model
Post a Comment