Dear All,
I have two simple yet complicated question.
I run my regressions on survey data using the OLS model in which productivity is my dependent and gender and age are my independent and explanatory variables
In the first run I do not add regional dummies (provinces) and in the second regression I add the regional dummies.
I find that my independent variable is NOT significant when I exclude regional dummies and in the second case I add regional dummies and find that it IS SIGNIFICANT. What does this mean and how do I interpret this
In another case I find that my other explanatory variable in the "no regional dummy model" is significant at the 90% confidence level and in the "regional dummy model" at the 95% confidence level
Thanks.
Related Posts with Variable Significance Changes After Adding Regional Dummies
Help with Stochastic Frontier Analysis/Translog Cost Function in Stata 15, bc95 modelDear Stata users, I am using Stata 15 and I am quite new in using this software. I am working on a …
reshape 4-levels wide format to 2X2 long formatHello, I have designed a 2✖2 within-subject design and get a 4-level repeated measure, how could I …
Change scores in two wave panel dataHello, I have a two wave balanced panel dataset and I am trying to model change in employment statu…
Diff command - Kernel-based Propensity Score Matching DID in the context of RCS dataHello, Hope you all are keeping safe. I hope some of you would be better positioned to answer a few…
Local macro returns variable name and subscript rather than valueHi Statalist, I am trying to rename a set of variables in Stata 16.1. The new variable name I want …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Variable Significance Changes After Adding Regional Dummies
Post a Comment