In performing a logistic regression with 'logit', I am encountering very significant association's (low standard errors) when I introduce the cluster() option. Without cluster() the associations are not significant at all. It does not matter what kind of groups are used to cluster on; I compared clustering on 1) the actual clusters of interest, 2) the identifier, i.e. no clusters, 3) random set of large clusters; all of these show highly significant values for some variables; while other variables seem to behave okay. However, I now I don't know which estimates I can trust to be accurate, and which I can't trust.
Does someone have an idea what could cause very low standard errors due to the cluster() option, even though the actual cluster variable doesn't seem to be of any influence? Is there anything I could check perhaps?
Related Posts with strange behaviour in logit with clustering of standard errors.
dynamic panel estimation using OLS - what am I missing?I am writing up research using the excellent xtabond2 to estimate correlates of economic growth usin…
exporting multiple tables to 1 table in excelhello All, I ve been trying to figure this one out for a while now. I have a data file with 25 indi…
Interpreting Coefficients Using Dummy InteractionI'm confused about what the overall effect of my independent variable, voteshare, on my dependent va…
Fisher LSD test following MANOVA?Hey everyone, I'm wondering if there is any way to use Fisher's post hoc LSD test after a MANOVA in…
Sub-setting data and mergingHi. I have two datasets that I want to merge, dataset 1 and dataset 2. They both have duplicates, so…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to strange behaviour in logit with clustering of standard errors.
Post a Comment