In performing a logistic regression with 'logit', I am encountering very significant association's (low standard errors) when I introduce the cluster() option. Without cluster() the associations are not significant at all. It does not matter what kind of groups are used to cluster on; I compared clustering on 1) the actual clusters of interest, 2) the identifier, i.e. no clusters, 3) random set of large clusters; all of these show highly significant values for some variables; while other variables seem to behave okay. However, I now I don't know which estimates I can trust to be accurate, and which I can't trust.
Does someone have an idea what could cause very low standard errors due to the cluster() option, even though the actual cluster variable doesn't seem to be of any influence? Is there anything I could check perhaps?
Related Posts with strange behaviour in logit with clustering of standard errors.
interaction termsHi, Im trying to run a regression using interaction terms including a dummy, could some one help me…
How to interpret the coefficient of the variable that takes first difference?Panel data model. x takes first difference to become stationary. Then how to interpret the coefficie…
titles of factor variables in output of a regressionDear all, I am running an OLS regression using factor variable as a regressor: Code: reg punt_glob…
Eventstudytools.com/barc/upload - duplicate entry errorHello reader, I am a beginner when it comes to data-analytics and I have been trying to conduct an …
r(132) too few quotesHi all, For the life of me I cannot figure out where the error lies in my code. I was hoping a seco…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to strange behaviour in logit with clustering of standard errors.
Post a Comment