Dear STATA users,
Although it feels like a simple question, I have spent a lot of time reading STATA's vec guide and other resources and I cannot figure this out on my own.
I am trying to estimate a VECM to see how several (six) economic fundamentals influence the long-run equilibrium exchange rate of a currency.
Additionally, I want to compare different proxies of these fundamentals to see which one can explain movements in the exchange rate best.
When I use the vecrank command, I find there are six cointegrated relationships.
However, I am only interested in explaining movements in the exchange rate. Does that mean I can run the vec command with rank one?
I also tried specifyin "rank(6)", in case I do need to specify rank(6).
But this gives me an output table in which all coefficients are zero, except for the last one. If I specify rank(5), all coefficients are zero except for the last two.
I would like to know if it is OK to use rank one in this situation. If not, I would like to know how to interpret the outcomes I get when I use the rank(6) option.
Any help would be very much appreciated!
Kind regards,
Hero Hovinga
Related Posts with Interpreting VEC output with ranks higher than 1
trade structural gravity equation; instruments; ppmlhdfeI work with trade data: 75 importers, 75 exporters; 2004-2018 period, six-digit HS Industries (5219)…
Specifying the linear predictor for random intercept model on panel data.Dear Stata Community, I am running a random intercept model on a longitudinal dataset where I am in…
identifying follow-up dates closest to a certain valueHello. I have a dataset with multiple follow-up dates (fu1, fu2 etc.) and corresponding morbidity s…
SUCRA in Stata 16Dear all, I have noticed that the SUCRA command for network meta-analysis is not working in Stata 1…
Choosing a control condition in Interrupted time seriesDear colleagues how can I choose the best control condition in Interrupted time-series among the pos…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting VEC output with ranks higher than 1
Post a Comment