Hello stata-users,
When using -cem- matching approach, I get 3 variables cem_strata, cem_matched, and cem_weights. The original stata paper doesn't mention anything about how to divide the dataset into treated vs untreated based on your chosen treatment variable.
If not, then I guess -cem- is only used for ATE on the population and doesn't quite help with how the two groups are different, correct?
Related Posts with -cem- and treated vs untreated
How to create variables recording characteristics of the other members in the householdHello, I’m working with a time use database with information at the individual and household level.…
How to estimate the exponential decay parameterHi Listers, My data code GP attendance per month (I have 24 months worth of data). Plotting the dat…
Inter-rater correlationHi. I have a dataset where two blinded outcome assessors independently scored a specific task. The t…
Interpretation of coefficients in first-differenced vs level specifications with and without additional variables in levelsIs there an intuitive explanation for why the interpretation of the coefficients in a first-differen…
RE: Standard deviation of the residualI ran logistic regression of y. I saved the residuals after estimating the regression. Step 1: logi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to -cem- and treated vs untreated
Post a Comment