Hello stata-users,
When using -cem- matching approach, I get 3 variables cem_strata, cem_matched, and cem_weights. The original stata paper doesn't mention anything about how to divide the dataset into treated vs untreated based on your chosen treatment variable.
If not, then I guess -cem- is only used for ATE on the population and doesn't quite help with how the two groups are different, correct?
Related Posts with -cem- and treated vs untreated
Multilevel Modeling for Survey Data Collected on Likert Scale- Variable with same value each year by category
- R-squared and dynamic panel threshold regression
- Interaction term without main effect / breakdown of a variable - Interpretaion of the variables?
- Use of indicator variables along with year fixed effects in panel regression framework by employing xtreg versus reghdfe
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to -cem- and treated vs untreated
Post a Comment