Hello stata-users,
When using -cem- matching approach, I get 3 variables cem_strata, cem_matched, and cem_weights. The original stata paper doesn't mention anything about how to divide the dataset into treated vs untreated based on your chosen treatment variable.
If not, then I guess -cem- is only used for ATE on the population and doesn't quite help with how the two groups are different, correct?
Related Posts with -cem- and treated vs untreated
Distribution of values among multiple variablesHello there, I have a question concerning my data set. I want to find out the total distribution of…
ACD (Autoregressive Conditional Duration) Model for calculating Intra-day Volatility from Trade DataI have trade data generated by a trading simulation software. The data is irregularly spaced w.r.t t…
Multilevel model (mixed command) with clustered, repeated-measures dataHello Statalist, I am building a multilevel model to test whether an environmental exposure is link…
Geometric interpolation of Return variableHi , Thanks to the post replied on the various issues at Statalist, I am able to understand things …
help with intervalplotHi, For a network meta-analysis I want to generate an intervalplot showing the forest plot but also …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to -cem- and treated vs untreated
Post a Comment