Hello stata-users,
When using -cem- matching approach, I get 3 variables cem_strata, cem_matched, and cem_weights. The original stata paper doesn't mention anything about how to divide the dataset into treated vs untreated based on your chosen treatment variable.
If not, then I guess -cem- is only used for ATE on the population and doesn't quite help with how the two groups are different, correct?
Related Posts with -cem- and treated vs untreated
Calculating Risk Ratios and CIsHi, I'm new to STATA 16. Looking for advice on calculating risk ratios and their confidence interva…
Random effects / POLS / Research QuestionsDear Stata Pros , Being interested in the effect of the share of women in board position on return …
correlationHi all, I need to use the function "mkcorr", but when I try to use it, this happens: Code: mkcorr…
Multilevel modelling: 'Intercepts as outcomes model'Hello, I am working with a multilevel binary logistic model. I have read up a lot about how to run a…
Examing and seasonal trends in malaria cases - is OLS appropriate?I am having some issues working with and interpreting seasonal data on malaria cases in country X. I…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to -cem- and treated vs untreated
Post a Comment