Dear Statalisters,
I am implementing a 2SRI IV estimation following Terza (2017) (see here https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs...urnalCode=stja) but I am unable to figure out one thing. In the second step of the first stage, the IVs are not strongly correlated with the treatment intensity variable (in Terza's example, number of cigarettes smoked). Also the F-statistic is below the conventional cut off of 10. My question is, which F-statistic (first step or second step) should one report and why? Doesnt the second step F-stat also need to be above the cut offs?
I look forward to your insights.
Emmanuel
Related Posts with Understanding and interpretation of second step results of the first stage 2SRI in the two step estimation.
Loop with spaces and quotesHello, I have a list of terms that have spaces and quotes that I want to loop over. I have been abl…
Logit with CI chartIs there a Code: lfitci or Code: qfitci type command to chart a logistic regression with confi…
SAS date to Statahi, i am working with a SAS data set and birthday variable reads as , list BIRTHY in 1/10 +------…
Problem with random-effects GLS regression and dummy variablesDear reader, I am a business student currently writing a thesis about the impact of global cities (…
Looking to add ifxed effects for a model but unsure how to go about it.Hi, I am doing a project where I am looking at state incarceration rates for the year 2016. I am loo…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Understanding and interpretation of second step results of the first stage 2SRI in the two step estimation.
Post a Comment