I ran the following equations via fixed effects (one with a lead for union status, and one without a lead for union status)
xtreg lwage educ black Hispanic experience married union, fe
xtreg lwage educ black Hispanic experience married unionlead, fe
for the equation without the lead, union status was significant at every level, however, when a lead was used, it was not significant at .01 (significant at .05) Does this mean union status is not strictly exogenous?
Thank you.
Related Posts with Question about exogeneity
Problem encoding dates: unordered valueHi all: I am gettings problems when I encode a date variable, to explain my problem I will use this…
Merge two datasets wih the same variable namesHi there, I have several datasets, each with the prediction error of different forecast models. I w…
New version of -ranktest- available on SSCWith thanks to Kit Baum, a new version of ranktest by Kleibergen-Schaffer-Windmeijer, version 2.0.03…
Difference between vce(cluster) and vce(bootstrap)?I'm using a fixed effects model. When dealing with heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation, I'm not s…
Probit marginal effectsI estimated the following probit model: Code: probit enrolled i.male##c.wealth i.male##c.oppcost h…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Question about exogeneity
Post a Comment