I ran the following equations via fixed effects (one with a lead for union status, and one without a lead for union status)
xtreg lwage educ black Hispanic experience married union, fe
xtreg lwage educ black Hispanic experience married unionlead, fe
for the equation without the lead, union status was significant at every level, however, when a lead was used, it was not significant at .01 (significant at .05) Does this mean union status is not strictly exogenous?
Thank you.
Related Posts with Question about exogeneity
Issue with simulations data - non r-class program may not set r()I have written a program which does not output my values correctly Code: program Datageneration, r…
Working with hierarchical dataHi, I’m working with hierarchical data from the Current Population Survey. Each household (QSTNUM) …
GLM with proportion DV and categorical IV. Which STATA formula should I use?I ran an experiment to see if a particular gamification design (2 treatment groups) would perform be…
Local with conditions within a loopHi everyone, I have to generate a new variable (adjusted_pri) for each country (cname) that is the r…
Syntax for using and merging multiple tempfilesI have been given a dataset (it is a translation table) to use that is set up in a fairly disorganiz…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Question about exogeneity
Post a Comment