Dear all,
I am attempting to estimate the effect of temperature and precipitation (at the district level, at t) and their interactions with historical means (HT, Hp respectively) on different quintiles of households’ consumption, using hh fixed effects. I am interested in applying quantile regression for panel data with nonadditive fixed effects (Powell, 2016), using the stata command qregpd.
I attempted to run the following command
qregpd C T TxH P PxH if URBAN==0, id(IDHH) fix(round) optimize(mcmc) noisy draws(1000) burn(100) arate(.5) q(0.15)
where, for demonstration, T refers to temperature and TxH is the interaction term.
I am a bit puzzeled, because all of the estimated coefficients are significant at 1% level. I think there must be something wrong.
I think I am not using the command ina right way.
Even though I read the help file corresponding to the command, I am still not sure what precisely the following part of the command means: draws(1000) burn(100) arate(.5) mean.
Can somebody advice how to practically apply the command?
Thanks so much.
Related Posts with qregpd application explanation
time dummies always should be included in iv part in xtabond2?I am now trying to implement xtabond2 for my panel data set spanning from 1998 to 2020. The issue th…
Help with parsing values in variablesDear Statalist, I'll like to create var3 as a dummy variable, with the value of 1 where an ID in var…
Need help figuring out this commandHi! I need help with a question on my stats homework and I cannot figure out how to set up this comm…
wide to long formatDear All, I have this data set Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. For more info, type help data…
why the frequency of variables would not change after winsorized?Unlike the trim, which remove the extreme data, the winsor function would replace the extreme data (…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to qregpd application explanation
Post a Comment