Hi all,
I was wondering whether it is better to transform the data then impute the missing values or vice-versa. the literature is not helping because it is controversial.
Stata/IC 15.1 for Mac
Related Posts with transforming then imputing or vice-versa
Strange thingsHi all, so I am running a simple regression on products. My aim is to see if at a more aggregate le…
Plotting trajectories from a growth curve analysis model (mixed effects model with linear splines) using marginsplotHi All I'm running a mixed-effects model (or multilevel model or growth curve analysis) to estimate…
Error: dta file corrupt. There was an I/O error. This suggests the problem is with the device rather than the file itself.Hi, I sometimes get the above error when opening a dataset. It is not very common, though common en…
Label with sysmiss value labeled.Hi, I have a dataset where it appears that there's a label with sysmiss labelled. When I type lab…
How to create a connected graph for paired mean outcomes at different times with CI whiskersHi everyone. I have tried to search for a way to make a learning curve graph with connected lines b…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to transforming then imputing or vice-versa
Post a Comment