Hi all,
I was wondering whether it is better to transform the data then impute the missing values or vice-versa. the literature is not helping because it is controversial.
Stata/IC 15.1 for Mac
Related Posts with transforming then imputing or vice-versa
Creating daily average and hourly levels from hourly dataHi everyone! I'm new to Stata and I would like to have some of your advice! I have gathered hourly…
MICE with ordinal categorical variablesHello, I'm doing multiple imputation using chained equations (MICE) on a set of ordinal variables: …
xtscc for T>NHi Dear, Can we apply xtscc when we have a long panel i.e. T>N? I know that it is for N>T, b…
Comparing dummy variables regarding another variableHello, My data set consists of funds and their historical returns from 2004-2018. My goal is in a f…
hierarchical random effect meta-analysisHi everyone, I am doing a meta-analysis and I want to use hierarchical random effect meta-analysis.…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to transforming then imputing or vice-versa
Post a Comment