I have a problem interpreting the marginal effect of a dummy variable in a logit model. (I am using Stata to estimate the logit regression)
I've run a simple logit say this:
logit underline i.L i.L_underline i.L2_q i.L2_underline
where all variables are dummies. Then to compute the margins I ran this:
margins, dydx(_all) at(L2_underline=1 L_underline=1)
I wanted to know the margins where L2_underline=1 andL_underline=1.
How should I interpret the margin for L2_underline?
Related Posts with interpreting marginal effect of logit dummy regressors at 1.
I want to regress the cumulative returns for each month, using*the most recent available data for all other variables.This is what my data looks like for one particular stock with the id 10104 (id variable is PERMNO): …
Endogenous Explanatory Variable in a Multinomial Logit EstimationHi Statalist I am wondering what are the possible options for modelling endogeneity in a multinomia…
How can I convert Variable names into the value of a new variable - in Stata?Dear All, I have a dataset that looks like this: year a b c ... 2000 value value value 20…
egen newvar = divide(existingvar), by(existingvar2)Hi! I know how to perform : Code: egen v5 = sum(var4), by(var1) var1 var4 v5 1 301 4323 1 4…
Store variable names for specific conditionHi all, I wonder if its possible save or store a list of variable names with a specific condition, …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to interpreting marginal effect of logit dummy regressors at 1.
Post a Comment