I have a problem interpreting the marginal effect of a dummy variable in a logit model. (I am using Stata to estimate the logit regression)
I've run a simple logit say this:
logit underline i.L i.L_underline i.L2_q i.L2_underline
where all variables are dummies. Then to compute the margins I ran this:
margins, dydx(_all) at(L2_underline=1 L_underline=1)
I wanted to know the margins where L2_underline=1 andL_underline=1.
How should I interpret the margin for L2_underline?
Related Posts with interpreting marginal effect of logit dummy regressors at 1.
Oaxaca & diff-in-diff advice (OLS assumtions)Hello, I am doing an oaxaca decomposition of the ethnic pay gap and then doing a diff-in-diff analy…
FMM errorI have the following estimation command using fmm: > fmm 3: regress $Y $T $X where $Y $X and $T…
Merge if mergeHi, I have used the command "merge", creating a new var called "epr" instead of "_merge": merge m…
Stata Export over EXCEL's row limitHi All, 1,048,576 is the max row limit for excel. So if you have STATA data over this limit and wan…
lagged variablesHi, I have a variable for gdp and for survey wave. I have three survey years and for each survey wav…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to interpreting marginal effect of logit dummy regressors at 1.
Post a Comment