Dear all,
I am working with panel data and would like to proceed with a two-way fixed effects model:
𝑌it=𝛼i+𝛾t+𝛽𝑋i+𝛿Z𝑖𝑡+𝜖𝑖𝑡
In my model, I have unobserved heterogeneity (ai) and time effects (𝛾t). Instead of using the within transformation, I want to apply the Mundlak specification to ensure the correlation between 𝛼i and regressors (I do not want to use the within transformation as it will remove 𝑋𝑖 from my model). The Mundlak approach is to time-averages of Z𝑖𝑡 as an additional regressor. Yet, I want to account for the unobserved time effects (𝛾𝑡). Does it make sense to simply include time dummies (given that I have very few time periods, so I think it is rather efficient) in Mundlak's specification? So the final model I want to estimate is:
𝑌it=𝛼i+𝛾tDt+𝛽𝑋i+𝛿Z𝑖t+b\bar{Z𝑖}+𝜖𝑖𝑡 where 𝐷𝑡is the time dummy.
Would be thankful for any suggestions.
Related Posts with two way fixed effects: Mundlak specification (time effects and fixed effects)
Extracting multiple years mentioned in a stringHi, I am trying to identify the date when a drug reached Phase III in the clinical trial process. M…
keep banks (id) with 3-consecutive years of observation or more in my panel dataGreetings statalist users, I need help with codes to eliminate the entire id (along with all its ob…
Generating a Variable to store REGRESS R-Squared Value Across Observations for Multiple VariablesHello, I am using Stata 15.1 and I have two datasets. There are two economic values in each dataset…
Identifying "Episodes"Hello All, I am doing a difference-in-difference analysis. I need to create an identifier, or a var…
No constant in first difference regressionI am running a first difference regression. I have seen the nocons option included on several posts …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to two way fixed effects: Mundlak specification (time effects and fixed effects)
Post a Comment