I am running a first difference regression. I have seen the nocons option included on several posts about first difference regressions on this forum. My R-Squared skyrockets from 0.12 to 0.94 when I use the nocons option and all the controls suddenly become statistically significant at the 1% level. However, I have also read that R-Squared becomes misleading with the nocons option. Can somebody explain whether I should be including a constant and what the reasons for the sudden increase in precision and goodness of fit are?
Related Posts with No constant in first difference regression
Hausman\Suest after mixedHi all, In my research i'm running a multilevel model. I used this syntax: Code: mixed sqrt_Rela…
Omitted due to collinearity errorHi, I am running a panel regression and had an issue with collinearity. Can someone please give me i…
Identify missing valuesHi there, I have a dataset from a survey which has 117 variables (Q1 - Q117) which composed of both …
Data quality control check with CUMSUMHi all, I have a big data set and am trying to QC some variables such as blood pressure and cholest…
Fixed effect vs Random EffectDear Statalist, I am running a two-way fixed effect model with IV estimation. I want to run a Hausm…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to No constant in first difference regression
Post a Comment