I am running a first difference regression. I have seen the nocons option included on several posts about first difference regressions on this forum. My R-Squared skyrockets from 0.12 to 0.94 when I use the nocons option and all the controls suddenly become statistically significant at the 1% level. However, I have also read that R-Squared becomes misleading with the nocons option. Can somebody explain whether I should be including a constant and what the reasons for the sudden increase in precision and goodness of fit are?
Related Posts with No constant in first difference regression
Fixed Effect Model Insignificant p-valuesHi Satalist Users, I currently working on an applied project for my BSc.I am trying to estimate the…
Looking for files issuesHello everyone, So I am doing an assignment. Our professor gave us zipped .dta files to use in Stat…
Fixed effects model with high rho and negative corr(u_i, Xb): a problem?I'm running some regression models with panel data from Brazilian municipalities (N = 64,708, Number…
estpost with xtsumHi all I have used the command estpost sum esttab using nsw_12_summary_all.csv, cells("mean") to …
the proper regressionplease I want to know which is the proper regression for my panel data while there is only heteroske…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to No constant in first difference regression
Post a Comment