I am currently working on a study on how to increase complementor participation in platform ecosystems. Complementors is the count of third-party producers of complementary products over time for various platforms (panel), and my dependent variable. As the variance (roughly 275) is bigger than the mean (21.5), and based on a histogram of complementors, I concluded that a negative-binomial distribution would be best-suited:
I would like to analyse a three-way interaction between independent variables, two of which are ratios (Lbreadthcontent, Lpropexcl), one of which is a count (Lgameengines). I was hoping to follow a procedure similar to this one (computing margins at one standard deviations below and above means), but after reading Leitgöb’s 2014 presentation, I understood that it wouldn’t be as simple. Could anyone advise on how to correctly analyse threeway interactions with a count as dependent variable?
This is an example of the data I am using:
Code:
* Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input int complementors float(Lbreadthcontent Lgameengines Lpropexcl instbase_ln) byte(genlaunch season) float(platformd Quarterly) 16 . . . 0 0 1 1 187 11 .6363636 13 .22857143 14.040285 0 0 1 188 7 .54545456 13 .26923078 14.865415 0 0 1 189 13 .4545455 14 .04761905 15.15477 0 0 1 190 30 .625 17 .2413793 15.42962 0 1 1 191 22 .8461539 17 .07936508 16.031548 0 0 1 192 18 .5 18 .07692308 16.273754 0 0 1 193 21 .6363636 20 .1724138 16.442444 0 0 1 194 44 .7692308 21 .12962963 16.558687 0 1 1 195 23 .7692308 22 .1025641 16.792501 0 0 1 196 end format %tq Quarterly
Code:
xtset platformd Quarterly xtnbreg complementors c.Lbreadthcontent##c.Lgameengines##c.Lpropexcl instbase_ln genlaunch season ,fe
Best regards,
Vladimir Sobota
0 Response to How to interpret interactions in negative binomial regression
Post a Comment