Dear everyone,
I had noticed a very interesting phenomenon in GMM estimation, which I can't figure out why. Hope you can give me some hints. Great thanks.
Take the following equation (the one listed in the help file of the code xtdpdgmm) as an example:
************************************************** ******************************************
webuse abdata
//gen new variable by minus a constant
gen w_new=w-2
//OLS
reg n l.n w k
reg n l.n w_new k
//GMM
xtdpdgmm L(0/1).n w k, gmm(L.n w k, l(1 4) c m(d)) iv(L.n w k, d) two vce(r)
xtdpdgmm L(0/1).n w_new k, gmm(L.n w_new k, l(1 4) c m(d)) iv(L.n w_new k, d) two vce(r)
************************************************** ***********************************************
Logically, when the independent variable minus a constant, we should expect the coefficients won't change, that is the case of OLS estimation. However, the coefficients vary for all independent variables in the GMM estimation (both in code xtdpdgmm and xtabond2). That's really hard for me to understand. Could anyone enlighten me on what leads to this outcome?
Best,
Haiyan
Related Posts with GMM estimation: when one of dependent variables minus a constant
How to cluster the standard error?Hi, I am new to Statalist forum. Hope someone can explain to me the issue that I am going through. …
create dummy variables for children educationHi I want to create four separate dummy variables at household level: 1. No children between 5 and …
R-squared in Panel Data (FE/RE models)Dear all, I am working with panel data, Fixed and Random effects models, and doing my interpretatio…
foreach copula command* - Syntax errorDear Stata members i have been trying to make a foreach command to estimate all 6 types of copula m…
creating new variable matching a definitionHello, I am reposting this, as the previous one had some typos. I need to count the diffuse nodule…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to GMM estimation: when one of dependent variables minus a constant
Post a Comment