Quick question regarding decomposition methods and the use of omega with the Oaxaca command.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6442665.pdf page 16 indicates the use of omega with the Oaxaca command gives you the Oaxaca and Ransom's decomposition.
https://www.stata.com/statalist/arch.../msg00585.html indicates the use of omega with the Oaxaca command gives you the Neumark decomposition.
Which one is correct? Sorry to be a pain, just a tad confused!
Related Posts with Neumark or Oaxaca-Ransom
Panel Data Modelling - Methodological IssuesDear Stata Users, I experience some serious confusion while working on my model due to the fact, th…
How to combine difference in difference with propensity score matching and NN matchingDear Statalisters, I am running a difference in difference and I was wondering what should I code i…
XTSUM2DOCX: Report summary statistics of panel data to a Word tableDear all, The user-written Stata command xtsum2docx is now available on SSC, thanks to Professor Ch…
Dummy Variable with Mutliple conditionsI am trying to generate a new variable to take on the values of 1 and 0. Where 1 represents alcohol …
Handling of missing quality information in admetanHi David, When I run the QE model in admetan with missing quality information it still runs and pro…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Neumark or Oaxaca-Ransom
Post a Comment