I've noticed in my reading of fixed effects panel studies a lot of researchers will control for location fixed effects and also cluster standard areas at this location. I was wondering if both are necessary? For example, in the context of local unemployment and health in the US, my understanding is that the state dummies in a fixed effects logistic regression control for any time-invariant state-level factors that are correlated with both state economic conditions and health. So, what does clustering standard errors at the state level do in such an analysis?
This is something I see a lot and am interested in. A better example can be found in the really interesting study below:
The Great Recession and Mothers’ Health Janet Currie, Valentina Duque, Irwin Garfinkel https://academic.oup.com/ej/article/...8/F311/5077911
Kindest regards,
John
Related Posts with Is it necessary to control for regional fixed effects AND cluster at the regional area in fixed effect panel analysis?
Interpreting output for 'test' command in logistic regression.I am using Stata14 to run logic regression on a number of variables including some that are categori…
Problem with Regression on Stata 15.1 on MacHi, I’m using Stata 15.1 for Mac from my university and I have a problem. Almost every time when I …
using -encode- with multiple string variablesI use Stata 14 on Windows. I have a data set of 30,000 observations with multiple observations (diff…
How can I overlap two marginsplot graph???Hi. I always thanks to statalist. I have six years of cross sectional data for SBP and BMI. There …
Bootstrapping a two-step estimation with survey dataHello everyone, This is more of a clarification question as my code runs without any errors: I am …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Is it necessary to control for regional fixed effects AND cluster at the regional area in fixed effect panel analysis?
Post a Comment