Hi all,
Just wondering as to why the sample sizes are different when I run Logit/probit and PMLE regression? I am running the model on the same sample, i.e. there are no missing values in my data for all the covariate I use, however, the sample sizes are still different between the two models.
I use the follwoing commanf:
firthlogit c $reg2
estimates store pmle1 ** sample size or number of obs 7081
logit c $reg2 , r
estimates store l1 ** sample size or number of obs 6903
probit c $reg2 ,r
estimates store p1 ** sample size or number of obs 6903
After I run the logit and probit I get the following message
"note: 9.income_week != 0 predicts failure perfectly
9.income_week dropped and 117 obs not used
note: 1.educ != 0 predicts failure perfectly
1.educ dropped and 61 obs not used"
Is there some way I can avoid these observations to not be dropped?
Thanks for the help !!
Kind Regards,
Aarushi
Related Posts with Logit, Probit and Penalised Maximum Likelihood (PMLE)
How to use inrange command with two line graphics?Hi Dear, Please, I would like to apply this condition for two line graphs as : Code: twoway l…
putdocx on existing formatted word fileHi I am planning to use putdocx for a series of documents/reports (more than 100 small reports). I …
Fixed Effects Regression (how to fix error:repeated time values within panel)Hey listers, how can I fix the error: repeated time values within panel? xtset FundId date xtreg dep…
Graphic legend includes empty categories?Greetings! Is there a way to force a pie graph legend to include categories that are empty? For exam…
Dicky Fuller Test and autocorrelation in the ResidualsHi guys, I currently have a problem in interpreting the output of the Dickey Fuller test when worki…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Logit, Probit and Penalised Maximum Likelihood (PMLE)
Post a Comment