Dear all,
I have a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) setup in which treatment intensity is clearly continuous rather than binary. I also have data on many pre and many post periods.
In a binary treatment intensity setup, the standard procedure for assessing the plausibility of assuming that absent treatment trends of the two groups would have been parallel seems to be to plot trends for the two groups for several pre-treatment periods ("pre trends analysis"). However, with a continuous treatment the number of treatment groups is not two, but is essentially up to as large as the number of units.
I am trying to figure out what is the best practice to examine the parallel trends assumption in this setup. While I see a lot of material on having more than 2 periods, I have not found good material on having more than 2 treatment levels.
Who knows more about this?
Thanks so much, PM
Related Posts with "Pre Trends" for DiD with continuous treatment
Help with StrposHi there, In the code below my goal is to convert the local below into a neat list by converting "R…
Bayesian multilevel parametric survival modelHi, I'm trying to figure out if a Bayesian multilevel parametric survival model can fit for the foll…
merging two panel data sets - 1:m mergingHello, I need help with two merging panel data sets according to the following variables: h_id, year…
Compute Female proportion in each district in long format data in Stata. I have a long format dataset where it has 5 variables: did---district id sid---school id id--studen…
Testing the Equality of the Regression Coefficients After PPMLHDFEI tried to estimate a PPML gravity model of bilateral trade with country-time fixed effects by -ppml…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to "Pre Trends" for DiD with continuous treatment
Post a Comment