Here is the model to estimate the impact of free trade agreements (fta) and preferential trade agreements (pta) on exports (exports) for annual data from 1990-2018 with 4 year intervals:
ppmlhdfe exports fta pta , a(im#year ex#year im#ex) cluster(im#ex)
The value of pseudo R2 remains as high as 0.99+, and it stays there for various model specifications. Should I doubt something for this? Is there some alternative measure I may additionally calculate?
Related Posts with ppmlhdfe Pseudo R2 0.99+
Effect size estimation for non-inferiority trialHi everyone, I need your help calculating the estimated effect size for a non-inferiority hypothesis…
Choice of model with binary outcome (conceptual problem)Hi I am trying to look at the determinants of finishing in the academic track conditional on choosi…
Combining panel data with different variables and different number of observations from multiple data filesHello. I am currently working with the BCS70 dataset which is a longitudinal panel study following 1…
Merging two data sets (Duplicates Problem)Hi Stata Users, I am new to this forum (but not new to Stata). I am having a problem with merging t…
xline based on a conditionHi Stata Users, I am using Stata v15 and would like to have an xline on the first non-missing occurr…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to ppmlhdfe Pseudo R2 0.99+
Post a Comment