Here is the model to estimate the impact of free trade agreements (fta) and preferential trade agreements (pta) on exports (exports) for annual data from 1990-2018 with 4 year intervals:
ppmlhdfe exports fta pta , a(im#year ex#year im#ex) cluster(im#ex)
The value of pseudo R2 remains as high as 0.99+, and it stays there for various model specifications. Should I doubt something for this? Is there some alternative measure I may additionally calculate?
Related Posts with ppmlhdfe Pseudo R2 0.99+
Randomized itemsDear Stata experts, I have recently finalized a data collection from an on-line platform with embed…
Removing insignificant variablesHello, As an example here, I am trying to estimate the following regression and compare when my depe…
Heckman Panel DataHello everyone! I have small doubts regarding estimation of Heckman model in the panel data framewor…
Interaction term in fixed effectsHello, I would like to clarify the following uncertainty: I am analysing the impact of technology o…
Reshaping data from wide to longHello! I am working with the following data obtained from World Bank's World Development Indicators.…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to ppmlhdfe Pseudo R2 0.99+
Post a Comment