Here is the model to estimate the impact of free trade agreements (fta) and preferential trade agreements (pta) on exports (exports) for annual data from 1990-2018 with 4 year intervals:
ppmlhdfe exports fta pta , a(im#year ex#year im#ex) cluster(im#ex)
The value of pseudo R2 remains as high as 0.99+, and it stays there for various model specifications. Should I doubt something for this? Is there some alternative measure I may additionally calculate?
Related Posts with ppmlhdfe Pseudo R2 0.99+
combined visual presentation of logistic regression resultsI am conducting logistic regressions with a dichotomous outcome (iatrogenic) and a single, continuou…
gsem with dependent binary variablesHello statalisters, Using Code: webuse womenwk , one can estimate a Heckman model in gsem as outl…
Store p-values in a matrix after 'actest'Dear Statalist users, I am using the 'actest' command to conduct a serial correlation test after ti…
How to rename all the variables?Hi, I want to rename all the variables by adding _year to all of them at the end (eg. religion_2005…
Is there any way of using psacalc within a loop?I am running a fixed effects model using the -areg- command. Using Emily Oster's -psacalc-, I am loo…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to ppmlhdfe Pseudo R2 0.99+
Post a Comment