Here is the model to estimate the impact of free trade agreements (fta) and preferential trade agreements (pta) on exports (exports) for annual data from 1990-2018 with 4 year intervals:
ppmlhdfe exports fta pta , a(im#year ex#year im#ex) cluster(im#ex)
The value of pseudo R2 remains as high as 0.99+, and it stays there for various model specifications. Should I doubt something for this? Is there some alternative measure I may additionally calculate?
Related Posts with ppmlhdfe Pseudo R2 0.99+
Out of sample prediction for a logit model with dummy for time effectI have a panel data which I would like to fit a logit/xtlogit for it. I added i.year as time dummies…
drop observations in long panel data set if variable changes over time, ignoring missing valuesI am working with data where certain time-invariant variables, e.g. sex and birth year, are changing…
Count variables without missings in rowHi, I have a panel data set and would like to count the number of "id"s that do not have any missin…
Multiple Regression Issues - Stata not showing any informationHi! I am trying to do a multiple regression but when I try to do it, I don't get any of the p-values…
Graph of event study with interaction termDear Clyde and All, I would like to graph an event study with an interaction term. I am performing …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to ppmlhdfe Pseudo R2 0.99+
Post a Comment