Code:
1.period#1.size#c.treatment 1.period#2.size#c.treatment 1.period#3.size#c.treatment 1.period#4.size#c.treatment 2.period#1.size#c.treatment 2.period#2.size#c.treatment 2.period#3.size#c.treatment 2.period#4.size#c.treatment
Code:
reghdfe ib0.period#i.size#c.treatment, absorb(panid period)
Code:
0.period#1.size#c.treatment 0.period#2.size#c.treatment 0.period#3.size#c.treatment 0.period#4.size#c.treatment 1.period#1.size#c.treatment 1.period#2.size#c.treatment 1.period#3.size#c.treatment 1.period#4.size#c.treatment
(2) If I use the full "##" expansion as in
Code:
reghdfe ib0.period##i.size#c.treatment, absorb(panid period)
Code:
0.period#c.treatment 1.period#c.treatment 1.period#2.size#c.treatment 1.period#3.size#c.treatment 1.period#4.size#c.treatment 2.period#2.size#c.treatment 2.period#3.size#c.treatment 2.period#4.size#c.treatment
I have been struggling with understanding how stata expands interactions for a while. The official documentation is not extremely helpful. Any solution/workaround or link to a good explanation for how this works is appreciated.
(3) I can get what I want by listing the period dummies explicitly:
Code:
reghdfe 1.period##i.size#c.treatment 2.period##i.size#c.treatment, absorb(panid period)
Thanks!
0 Response to Stata triple interaction and base category
Post a Comment