Hi everyone,
I hope I'm posting this in the right place.
Here is my question :
I've always heard by my teachers that when you use an explanatory variable that is qualitative (binary or more), each modality of this variable must represent at least 5% of the total population. But what happens if one doesn't ? What if one of the modalities represents less than 5% of the total sample ?
I remember something like "stadards errors are greater, hence the robustness of the estimated coefficient is poorer..".
But is it that bad ? Even if my modality has A LOT of observations (like 1000, 10 000, 100 000) but is still under those 5% of representation ?
Thanks you very much for your help and guidance.
Jordan.
Related Posts with Consequences of modality under 5% of the total population ?
File read and tokenize localsHi everyone! I have been trying to tokenize locals that are produced by file read. However, weird t…
Multiple hypothesis testing command updatedFor those interested in multiple hypothesis testing, a new version of wyoung is now available on SSC…
KINKYREG: new Stata command for instrument-free inference in linear regression models with endogenous regressorsI just released a brand-new Stata package called kinkyreg, which I developed jointly with Jan Kiviet…
Calculate row medianIn my panel data (firm-year), I was able to calculate the row mean using egen RowMean=rmean(Var1 Var…
Wage distribution percentile differencesHi, everyone! Right now I have to do research about how the minimum wage affects wage distribution.…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Consequences of modality under 5% of the total population ?
Post a Comment