Dear Statalist,
I am using ordered logistic regression, depvar: 5-scale happiness level (women only), indepvars: employment status (employed, unemployed, housewife, other employment status) and educational level (low edu, mid edu, high edu) as well as their interactions. Is the below command correct? I obviously leave a reference category out for employment status and edu level as indep variables (ref categories: employed and high edu), should I do it for the interactions as well (employed and highedu not included in any interaction terms)?
ologit happiness unemployed housewife otherstatus lowedu midedu unemployed#lowedu unemployed#midedu housewife#lowedu housewife#midedu other#lowedu other#midedu if gender==2
As per interpretation, which one (or if neither what) is correct?
E.g regarding the coefficient for unemployed#lowedu interaction:
a) it is the impact of being unemployed AND low educated compared to all other employment statuses and educational levels on happiness level
b) if it is correct to keep employed and highedu out of the interaction terms as well, should I say being unemployed rather than employed and being low educated rather than highly educated is ...
Do you think I should follow up with "margins unemployed#lowedu unemployed#midedu housewife#lowedu housewife#midedu other#lowedu other#midedu" as well?
Thank you SO much in advance!
A.
Related Posts with command and interpretation for categorical dummy interaction
How to correctly use and interpret interaction terms in panel datasetDear Stata Community, First of all I wanted to say hi as I am new here and to express my gratitude …
Analysis of an interrupted stepped wedge cluster RCTDear All, I am part of a team conducting a stepped wedge cluster randomised control trial to improv…
How to export multiple tables outputted from a single Stata commandI am running Stata code which gives two tables from a single command. I wish to export the first of …
xtabond2: Interaction endogenous and exogenous variableHello everyone, This is my first post here. I have a question about the xtabond2 command. I would …
Problems with fmm package and streg packageHello, I am doing a parametric survival analysis with a loglogistic baseline hazard function. I wil…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to command and interpretation for categorical dummy interaction
Post a Comment