I run both mlogit and mprobit regressions. Stata reports pseudo R2 for mlogit but not for mprobit.
I understand that McFadden R2 is calculated using 1 - loglik(intercept only model)/loglik(full model). So I try to calculate R2 for mprobit model using the same method. The problem is:
When I run "mlogit depvar indepvar, base(0)", using fitstat, Log-Lik Intercept Only: -926.720
However, when I run "mlogit depvar, base(0)" this supposedly intercept-only model gives log-likelihood of -1199.8673.
If I manually run intercept-only model and calculate the McFadden R2 on my own, I couldn't get the same Pseudo R2 as shown by Stata. This raises my concern of calculating Pseudo R2 for mprobit model on my own since the figures won't be comparable.
Is there anything I did wrong? Or anyway to obtain Pseudo R2 for mprobit?
Related Posts with Pseudo R2 for mprogit - Loglik with intercept-only model
Need help looping over string valuesHello, I want to loop over the values of a string variable to create a Word document titled after e…
save 2sls results in matrixHi statalist, The following code is for my 2sls model. I wanted to store the results into a matrix …
Tools for creating HTML documents with StataDoes anyone have preferred options for creating HTML documents that incorporate Stata code? I've hea…
STATA labelling wrong?Hi all, I have a ordinal variable with 4 levels, when I upload my data, STATA recognizes it as a st…
OT: ASA President’s Task Force Statement on Statistical Significance and Replicability (1-Aug-2021)This may interest some members, especially anyone who is subscribed to this recent thread. https://…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Pseudo R2 for mprogit - Loglik with intercept-only model
Post a Comment