I run both mlogit and mprobit regressions. Stata reports pseudo R2 for mlogit but not for mprobit.
I understand that McFadden R2 is calculated using 1 - loglik(intercept only model)/loglik(full model). So I try to calculate R2 for mprobit model using the same method. The problem is:
When I run "mlogit depvar indepvar, base(0)", using fitstat, Log-Lik Intercept Only: -926.720
However, when I run "mlogit depvar, base(0)" this supposedly intercept-only model gives log-likelihood of -1199.8673.
If I manually run intercept-only model and calculate the McFadden R2 on my own, I couldn't get the same Pseudo R2 as shown by Stata. This raises my concern of calculating Pseudo R2 for mprobit model on my own since the figures won't be comparable.
Is there anything I did wrong? Or anyway to obtain Pseudo R2 for mprobit?
Related Posts with Pseudo R2 for mprogit - Loglik with intercept-only model
Error Running xtcsd testHi Dear, When I run xtcsd, pesaran after estimating fixed effects model in Stata.....I get the erro…
conformability error (503) in Synthetic control methodI am facing the issue of “conformability error (503)” while running the synth command in Stata 15.1.…
recode two continuous variables into one categorical(3 categories) variableI am new to Stata and I am trying to recode two continuous variables into one categorical(3 categori…
Help Needed on Plotting Rates by Categorical variableDear Stata Community, I have three variables: an event_ind (indicating event occurs) and an educat…
Fixed Effects and Random EffectsHi Dear, Can you please tell me whether Fixed Effects estimations with xtreg, fe and Random Effects…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Pseudo R2 for mprogit - Loglik with intercept-only model
Post a Comment