I run both mlogit and mprobit regressions. Stata reports pseudo R2 for mlogit but not for mprobit.
I understand that McFadden R2 is calculated using 1 - loglik(intercept only model)/loglik(full model). So I try to calculate R2 for mprobit model using the same method. The problem is:
When I run "mlogit depvar indepvar, base(0)", using fitstat, Log-Lik Intercept Only: -926.720
However, when I run "mlogit depvar, base(0)" this supposedly intercept-only model gives log-likelihood of -1199.8673.
If I manually run intercept-only model and calculate the McFadden R2 on my own, I couldn't get the same Pseudo R2 as shown by Stata. This raises my concern of calculating Pseudo R2 for mprobit model on my own since the figures won't be comparable.
Is there anything I did wrong? Or anyway to obtain Pseudo R2 for mprobit?
Related Posts with Pseudo R2 for mprogit - Loglik with intercept-only model
Create a duplicates drop logic working for missing valueHi Statalisters, I am working on my data cleaning and have such a problem. When I use duplicat…
Changing variable names on a forest plot STATA 15.1Ok so i have ran a mata analysis odds ratio and created a forest plot,i have what i need on the grap…
unique pairs from panel dataHi, I have balanced panel data with ID and Time (and some other variables), and I want the unique ID…
Testing for Non-linearity in Fixed EffectsHello, I am running individual FE models where my dep variable (DV) is treated as continuous but it…
Dropping duplicates based on another variableI have a large dataset with patient encounters, of which some patients may have had multiple encount…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Pseudo R2 for mprogit - Loglik with intercept-only model
Post a Comment