I run both mlogit and mprobit regressions. Stata reports pseudo R2 for mlogit but not for mprobit.
I understand that McFadden R2 is calculated using 1 - loglik(intercept only model)/loglik(full model). So I try to calculate R2 for mprobit model using the same method. The problem is:
When I run "mlogit depvar indepvar, base(0)", using fitstat, Log-Lik Intercept Only: -926.720
However, when I run "mlogit depvar, base(0)" this supposedly intercept-only model gives log-likelihood of -1199.8673.
If I manually run intercept-only model and calculate the McFadden R2 on my own, I couldn't get the same Pseudo R2 as shown by Stata. This raises my concern of calculating Pseudo R2 for mprobit model on my own since the figures won't be comparable.
Is there anything I did wrong? Or anyway to obtain Pseudo R2 for mprobit?
Related Posts with Pseudo R2 for mprobit - Loglik with intercept-only model
Reconciling sample size calculations using Cochran's formula and Wald testThis is quite a basic question but I could not find a clear answer elsewhere. If we wish to draw a …
Zigzag or Squiggle in twoway line graphDear all, I would like to add a zigzag or squiggle at my y-axis in my graph, but I don't know how t…
Family SizeDear all, I am having trouble in finding the total number of children in a household where househol…
Difference of xtivreg2 and reghdfe with absorbDear Community, I am writing to you regarding a simple estimation problem. I was curious about the …
Obtaining a SE for the sum of predictions, following a regression modelHi all Is anyone familiar with a user-written package or a well documented approach to calculate a …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Pseudo R2 for mprobit - Loglik with intercept-only model
Post a Comment