I run both mlogit and mprobit regressions. Stata reports pseudo R2 for mlogit but not for mprobit.
I understand that McFadden R2 is calculated using 1 - loglik(intercept only model)/loglik(full model). So I try to calculate R2 for mprobit model using the same method. The problem is:
When I run "mlogit depvar indepvar, base(0)", using fitstat, Log-Lik Intercept Only: -926.720
However, when I run "mlogit depvar, base(0)" this supposedly intercept-only model gives log-likelihood of -1199.8673.
If I manually run intercept-only model and calculate the McFadden R2 on my own, I couldn't get the same Pseudo R2 as shown by Stata. This raises my concern of calculating Pseudo R2 for mprobit model on my own since the figures won't be comparable.
Is there anything I did wrong? Or anyway to obtain Pseudo R2 for mprobit?
Related Posts with Pseudo R2 for mprobit - Loglik with intercept-only model
Paneldata regression with a loopDear all, I am using Stata MP 16.1. For my masterthesis I want to obtain elasticities for sector x …
two way fixed effects: Mundlak specification (time effects and fixed effects)Dear all, I am working with panel data and would like to proceed with a two-way fixed effects model:…
Import XML data with Stata - usexmlexDear Stata community, does anyone know how to import xml-data with Stata Version 16? I tried to in…
Create variable that calculates difference in matched observation and "normal observation" of a variableHi all, For my thesis I need to extract the difference in Issue Yield between green bonds and conve…
Counting yearly cumulative observationsHi all! I am working with the dataset in the attachment. The data in the variable appln_id are Amer…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Pseudo R2 for mprobit - Loglik with intercept-only model
Post a Comment