I have ordinal, that is to say Likert-type of data, with four response categories.
Bandalos (2018) and Finney & DiStefano (2013) urge researchers to avoid traditional CFA approaches with such data.
Thus, I have run exploratory factor analysis based on a polychoric matrix as well as those based on the traditional Pearson’s R (ie, with dat treated continuously) to see if results for a CFA would differ.
I have two questions: 1. Does anyone have any good citations on comparisons of these two approaches or simulation-based studies comparing the two approaches with ordinal data?
2. gllamm can accommodate CFAs with ordinal data, correct?
Thanks
Related Posts with Ordinal Data: CFA treating data accordingly vs continuously
xtpdyn marginsDear all, I've encountered a problem when implementing xtpdyn postestimation. Using this example: xt…
Marginsplot only some categoriesDear all, I am struggling with a probably easy procedure. I estimate the following command: logit…
Restructuring of variables using multiple if conditionsHi all, I got a question regarding the reconstruction of my dataset using multiple if commands.I de…
Gini coefficient in a LoopDear all, I need to compute the Gini coefficient over country and over waves. Therefore, I realized …
For fractional regression, it is appropriate to rank the dependent variable for the concern that the measure is noisy?Hi, I am using fractional regression, fracreg in Stata, to analyze how city's high school student gr…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Ordinal Data: CFA treating data accordingly vs continuously
Post a Comment