I have ordinal, that is to say Likert-type of data, with four response categories.
Bandalos (2018) and Finney & DiStefano (2013) urge researchers to avoid traditional CFA approaches with such data.
Thus, I have run exploratory factor analysis based on a polychoric matrix as well as those based on the traditional Pearson’s R (ie, with dat treated continuously) to see if results for a CFA would differ.
I have two questions: 1. Does anyone have any good citations on comparisons of these two approaches or simulation-based studies comparing the two approaches with ordinal data?
2. gllamm can accommodate CFAs with ordinal data, correct?
Thanks
Related Posts with Ordinal Data: CFA treating data accordingly vs continuously
Panels are not nested within clustersDear Statalister, I basically encounter a problem similar to this: https://www.statalist.org/forums…
Error calculating marginal effects with a tobit modelI am looking at the effect of permitting standards, rebates, average income, and electricity price o…
Choosing the right modeling technique available in STATADear Stata Experts: I am working on an assignment to predict state policy on a particular issue. Th…
subsetByVIF -- An ado file that selects a subset of covariates constrained by variance inflation factors (VIFs)subsetByVIF selects subsets of the covariates such that each covariate in a given subset has a VIF t…
Contour plot cannot handle missing xHi all, As you can see from my code below, I only want to plot the cells with F statistics higher t…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Ordinal Data: CFA treating data accordingly vs continuously
Post a Comment