I have ordinal, that is to say Likert-type of data, with four response categories.
Bandalos (2018) and Finney & DiStefano (2013) urge researchers to avoid traditional CFA approaches with such data.
Thus, I have run exploratory factor analysis based on a polychoric matrix as well as those based on the traditional Pearson’s R (ie, with dat treated continuously) to see if results for a CFA would differ.
I have two questions: 1. Does anyone have any good citations on comparisons of these two approaches or simulation-based studies comparing the two approaches with ordinal data?
2. gllamm can accommodate CFAs with ordinal data, correct?
Thanks
Related Posts with Ordinal Data: CFA treating data accordingly vs continuously
Modelling longitudinal dataHello members, pleaseRegression for follow-up studies i have a data on follow up study, data was col…
Create consecutive days with unequal number of obs per dayDear Stata folks, I have a dataset with patient_ids, days and a measurement(outcome). Patients may …
couting unique observation id sales profit year size_group a 36 9 1991 1 a 48 17 1992 1 a 25 7 1993 2 b 65 18 19…
Issue with xtologit (non concave routine)Hallo everybody I ask for your help to manage an issue as described in the object of this post. I am…
Modelling dose with multiple balancing score. Imbens (2000)Good day statlisters , please I am interested in applying propensity using modelling dose of treatme…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Ordinal Data: CFA treating data accordingly vs continuously
Post a Comment