I have ordinal, that is to say Likert-type of data, with four response categories.
Bandalos (2018) and Finney & DiStefano (2013) urge researchers to avoid traditional CFA approaches with such data.
Thus, I have run exploratory factor analysis based on a polychoric matrix as well as those based on the traditional Pearson’s R (ie, with dat treated continuously) to see if results for a CFA would differ.
I have two questions: 1. Does anyone have any good citations on comparisons of these two approaches or simulation-based studies comparing the two approaches with ordinal data?
2. gllamm can accommodate CFAs with ordinal data, correct?
Thanks
Related Posts with Ordinal Data: CFA treating data accordingly vs continuously
Creating ID groupHi, I have panel data comprising companies and employees. The companies have existing IDs, but I nee…
bar chart with multiple comparisons.hello, I am trying to create a bar graph that shows the distribution in terms of frequency of differ…
Continuos selection variable, switching modeI wish to estimate the following model: y=b0+b1*x1+b2*X2+mu if X2>= f(x1) and y=a0+a1*x1+epsilon …
Renaming similar observations in one datasetHello all, first post and very new to STATA! I would appreciate some help with renaming observation…
Continuos selection variable, switching modeI wish to estimate the following model: y=b0+b1*x1+b2*X2+mu if X2>= f(x1) and y=a0+a1*x1+epsilon …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Ordinal Data: CFA treating data accordingly vs continuously
Post a Comment