Hello, I've tried the logit with a binary variable but I found out that the sample size is only 95.
I found out that Firth's Penalized Maximumlikehood methods can reduce small sample bias so that I tried it,
and AIC improved better than logit model,
but when I ran the margins, it shows negative value.
logit experience money if married==1
margins, at (money=4)
firthlogit experience money if married==1
margins, at (money=4)
only difference was firthlogit and then I got a negative margins value(it didn't happen at logit).
Why is that? and how can I solve the problem?
Thanks a lot!
Related Posts with Negative margins value with penalized maximumlikelihood estimates
overlaying histograms produce "empty" part on x-axisDear all, I am making a plot consisting of overlaying histograms. My data ranges from -9 to 14. Eve…
GLM and SQREG heteroscedasticity analysisHi all, I'm trying to analyse the heteroscedasticity posteestimation of my two possible models regre…
Reshape wide to long over various attributesI have a dataframe that looks like so: Q1_2008_East Q1_2008_West Q2_2008_East Q2_2008_West .....…
Regression models with exposure, outcome, and GROUP of covariates in one loopHi All - just struggling to get some basic regression code to work how I want it in Stata. Imagine i…
Calculating the share of respondents with certain preferences in Discrete Choice Experiments -mixed logitDear Stata users, I have been trying to replicate the following paper from Arne Risa Hole (2007) : …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Negative margins value with penalized maximumlikelihood estimates
Post a Comment