Code:
tab income 98113.21 | 1 0.01 99.79 100502.5 | 5 0.05 99.83 103448.3 | 2 0.02 99.85 104522.6 | 1 0.01 99.86 107758.6 | 1 0.01 99.87 112782 | 1 0.01 99.88 117735.8 | 1 0.01 99.89 120689.7 | 1 0.01 99.90 129310.3 | 1 0.01 99.91 140939.6 | 1 0.01 99.92 150753.8 | 1 0.01 99.93 150862.1 | 2 0.02 99.95 165829.1 | 1 0.01 99.96 215517.2 | 2 0.02 99.98 216867.5 | 1 0.01 99.99 241206 | 1 0.01 100.00 ------------+----------------------------------- Total | 10,270 100.00
I want to do a linear probability fixed effects model across all 4 waves, examining how changes in income influence changes in health. However, my understanding is that this model will tell me the change in the outcome for a one-unit increase in my x-variable (here this is income) while what I'd actually like to see if the change in the outcome for a one unit decrease in the x-variable.
In the below toy example x is statistically significant and an additional unit of the x income variable increases the probability of the y-health outcome by 1.1 percentage points. As my results say this, can I say that the opposite also holds true and that one less unit of the x income variable decreases the probability of the y-health outcome by 1.1 percentage points? This would allow me to report the impact of decreases rather than increases in income.
I realize that this is a very simple inquiry but I want to ensure that my approach is correct!
Thanks,
John
Code:
xtreg y_health_variable x_income_variable control_variable, cluster (region) fe robust Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 1578 Group variable: id Number of groups = 635 R-sq: within = 0.0066 Obs per group: min = 1 between = 0.0062 avg = 2.5 overall = 0.0047 max = 3 F(3,28) = 4.34 corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.0538 Prob > F = 0.0124 (Std. Err. adjusted for 29 clusters in current_county_y1) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Robust binary_health_y | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- x_income_variable| .0108672 .0043554 2.50 0.019 .0197888 .0019456 | control_variable| .0074049 .0038814 1.91 0.067 -.0005457 .0153555 _cons | .6171357 .0901617 6.84 0.000 .4324479 .8018235 -------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- sigma_u | .35499044 sigma_e | .35438184 rho | .50085794 (fraction of variance due to u_i) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Response to If increases in my x var cause increases in my y var does the opposite also hold true?
Post a Comment