Hello,
I have a general doubt about PSM. The analyses of the graph (using teffects psmatch) are much better comparing before and after matching, the trend of the curves (treatment and control) are similar. But only until the propensity score is equal 0.8. This is happening for my 5 different years data.
Is it possible to use or somehow delimit the use of the propensity score from 0 to 0.8 so that I have a better matching?
What would you suggest? What can be the problem of this part of density (from 0.8 to 1)?
Thanks in advance,
Jacque
Related Posts with Delimit Propensity Score to obtain a better matching
Panel data and OLS assumptionsHi! Few days ago, there was an online webinar in my country in which the lecturers stated that many …
Ratio of male to female in a datasetHello. It's probably an easy question but I searched a lot and found nothing. I have a data set an…
Using local macros in tslineHi, I am using Stata 16 and would need help in macros. Below is my dataset: Code: * Example gener…
Finding last day of the monthHello, I have the following code: Code: generate dayofmonth = day(date) rename (THENATIVE-ZWAHLENM…
melogit with crossed (non nested!) factors does not workDear all, thanks in advance. I have an issue that freaks me out. I wonder if I'm wrong to set up th…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Delimit Propensity Score to obtain a better matching
Post a Comment