Hello,
I have a general doubt about PSM. The analyses of the graph (using teffects psmatch) are much better comparing before and after matching, the trend of the curves (treatment and control) are similar. But only until the propensity score is equal 0.8. This is happening for my 5 different years data.
Is it possible to use or somehow delimit the use of the propensity score from 0 to 0.8 so that I have a better matching?
What would you suggest? What can be the problem of this part of density (from 0.8 to 1)?
Thanks in advance,
Jacque
Related Posts with Delimit Propensity Score to obtain a better matching
T-Test Using Three GroupsI am trying to do t-test where I have three groups (AIC, GIC, Others) - accordingly I created a vari…
spmap errorHi, I am learning how to create maps in Stata using spmap. Was trying out the examples using help s…
difficult to find the problem in MLE codingHello everyone, this is the code i am writing to estimate MLE estimates. while writing this program …
Using the coefplot command to plot odds ratios with p-values in multiple imputation estimations – potential bug to fix!Dear Ben Jann, I was trying to plot odds ratios of mixed-effects logistic models of the association…
Clustering with imputationI am using a dataset that uses a school-based sampling design, and thus I want to cluster with schoo…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Delimit Propensity Score to obtain a better matching
Post a Comment