Hi,
Estimating by system GMM and treating the variable of interest as exogenous, without including the lagged of the variable of interest, the estimated coefficient of the variable of interest is about 0.025 (p<0.01). All variables are transformed to natural logarithms. Including the first lag of the variable of interest give a coefficient for the level of -0.925 (p<0.01) and a coefficient for the lag of 0.896 (p<0.01). The long run effect is therefore very similar to the level coefficient without including the lag (0.029 compared to 0.025).
Should I be concerned by the drastic difference between the level and the lag coefficient?
Thanks in advance.
Related Posts with Coefficient of level and lagged explanatory variable with different sign
how to generate number of children, working children, child labour?Hey! I am using the dataset Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) 2016 of Bangladesh and I …
showing the whole number for numerical variablesHi there, I have to combine the values of two numerical variables into a value in a new numerical v…
totalHi, I have 3 variables (var1 var2 var3) each with 5 categories (1, 2, 3, 4 & 5). I would like to…
Transforming a square matrix to three variables (row, column and value)Hi, I am trying to transform a matrix into three variables: row number, column number, and matrix v…
Recoding to a categorical variable_'the number of new and transformed varnames should be the same r(198)'Hi there, I am trying to recode age in my dataset (min 40, max 70) into 7 categories; recode age 40…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Coefficient of level and lagged explanatory variable with different sign
Post a Comment