I used vce(cluster) to account for clustering within 9 groups in a set of nested logistic regression models. Stata doesn't want to give me Wald chi2 stats because I have too many variables in the model in relation to # of clusters, and used up my df. Stata also said both Wald and lrtest would be misleading. So, what *wouldn't* be misleading to report to describe fit and compare fit among nested models? Are pseudo-R square, AIC, BIC, and log likelihood #s still meaningful to interpret? Or are there other stats I don't know about?
Thanks in advance!
Related Posts with What stats are appropriate to assess model fit for nested logit models if Wald is not possible for clustered data?
Interpretation of significances with moderation effectI am running a panel regression with the following problem: In the first regression X has a signifi…
A Mata Cheat Sheet posterHi all, I have created an A0 size Mata Cheat Sheet poster that you can print out and hang for some …
The commands that work in Stata-16 and not in 17.Hello everyone, I used some commands in my do-file in Stata-16 and now they do not work in Stata-17.…
Psmatch2, Troubles identifying matched pairsHi I am doing Nearest Neighbour propensity score matching and have used the following set of command…
Interpretation of significances with moderation effectI am currently running panel regression with random effects and there is a result that I cant fully …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to What stats are appropriate to assess model fit for nested logit models if Wald is not possible for clustered data?
Post a Comment