Hello,
I want to make a propensity score matching using four different treatments, which are all metric rather than binary.
Thus my first question:
I found the commands doseresponse and doseresponse2. Are there any differences in terms of timeliness or only in their ability to adjust for different settings?
Is there also a possibility to include all four treatments in a model at the same time, especially when all are not binary, but metric?
Thank you for your time and help!
Related Posts with Propensity Score Matching with multiple and continous treatments
Loop for determining where a respondent abandoned the surveyHello, I am working with survey data and I want to be able to analyze at which points in the survey…
Data Wrangling QuestionHello Statalist, I've got a vexing data wrangling question that I need help figuring our. I've got …
interrupted time series analysis with non-equivalent dependent variablesHello, I'm familiar with Stata's arima and itsa commands for estimating interrupted time series ana…
Create table of variable names and labelsHi, This seems very simple, but I cannot find anything on a straightforward way of doing it. I have…
Axis inteserction in scheme plotplainDear All, I am making a twoway graph using the scheme plotplain. The user written scheme by Daniel B…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Propensity Score Matching with multiple and continous treatments
Post a Comment