Hello,
I want to make a propensity score matching using four different treatments, which are all metric rather than binary.
Thus my first question:
I found the commands doseresponse and doseresponse2. Are there any differences in terms of timeliness or only in their ability to adjust for different settings?
Is there also a possibility to include all four treatments in a model at the same time, especially when all are not binary, but metric?
Thank you for your time and help!
Related Posts with Propensity Score Matching with multiple and continous treatments
How to do the calculation of matrix mutiplying databaseHi Stata users, I have some problems with the calculation of matrix with database. For example, I h…
Randomly select contents from one variable in listHello, For each observation, I have up to six variables that describe a potential location (x1-x6).…
How to know the fractional polynomial used in twoway fpfitciGreetings Stata Users & experts, I'm currently reviewing some of the methods to graph relations…
Does a dofile have meta-data (like a word document) that says something about it's creator?I will upload a dofile for an anonymous submission to a journal. However, I cannot seem to find out …
Replacing missing values within a variable with true value based on an ID - Seeking efficient solution.Apologies in advance for a somewhat convoluted title for the post. I have already solved the problem…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Propensity Score Matching with multiple and continous treatments
Post a Comment