Hello,
I want to make a propensity score matching using four different treatments, which are all metric rather than binary.
Thus my first question:
I found the commands doseresponse and doseresponse2. Are there any differences in terms of timeliness or only in their ability to adjust for different settings?
Is there also a possibility to include all four treatments in a model at the same time, especially when all are not binary, but metric?
Thank you for your time and help!
Related Posts with Propensity Score Matching with multiple and continous treatments
Where is program_name stored?Dear All,
I have a program as follows:
program BSE_02052018
version 12
syntax, MAINdirectory(str)
…
Graphic illustration of 3-way interaction between dummy, ordinal, and metric variableHi
I am currently looking into how the election of Trump (main independent variable) affected satis…
Difference in Difference estimates with binary variablesDear all
I am struggling in understanding and analysing my data with the diff function & I hope…
query on time-series function for computing averageI am attempting to calculate average assets i.e. computed as average assets = (assets (t) + assets (…
xtprobit with clustered standard errorsHi, I have panel data, with a binary dependent variable. The data is at the individual level. I want…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Propensity Score Matching with multiple and continous treatments
Post a Comment