Dear all,
I'm testing the OLS assumptions for a multiple cross-sectional regression model.
In relation to this, I would like to ask if one first have to test all the assumptions before running eventual standard robust errors-model (if heteroscedasticity is a problem).
So, should I first test for homoscedasticity and if heteroscedasticity is present then use standard robust errors. Should I then test for linearity and normality on the standard robust errors-model? Or should all OLS assumptions tests be carried out on the initial model?
Also, I would like to ask if somebody knows the code in stata for finding the 1 percent percentile and 99 percent percentile thresholds? (in relation to deleting outliers)
Lastly, in relation to the constant variance (homoscedasticity) and linearity assumptions, should I then apply just normal redisuals, standardized or studentized residuals?
Thanks in advance!
Best,
Anders
Related Posts with Testing the OLS assumptions in relation to standard robust errors
Cannot use python in Stata 16.1 in CatalinaI have tried to solve the problem, but it seems to be stubborn. What to do? I installed the new vers…
Cannot use python in Stata 16.1 in CatalinaCannot use python in Stata 16.1 in Catalina Today, 03:38 I have tried to solve the problem, but it …
Display full name of variableHi, I want to see variable name "change_land_own_3" , instead of "chan~n_3" . How should I do it? …
Questions about "xtrifreg" - Unconditional quantile regression with fixed effects?Dear Statalists, (1) Can anyone help me check robustness for "xtrifreg" please? And how can I run s…
Display full name of variableHi, When I use the list variable, display short name "chan~n_3", but it is actually "change_land_own…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Testing the OLS assumptions in relation to standard robust errors
Post a Comment