Dear all,
I'm testing the OLS assumptions for a multiple cross-sectional regression model.
In relation to this, I would like to ask if one first have to test all the assumptions before running eventual standard robust errors-model (if heteroscedasticity is a problem).
So, should I first test for homoscedasticity and if heteroscedasticity is present then use standard robust errors. Should I then test for linearity and normality on the standard robust errors-model? Or should all OLS assumptions tests be carried out on the initial model?
Also, I would like to ask if somebody knows the code in stata for finding the 1 percent percentile and 99 percent percentile thresholds? (in relation to deleting outliers)
Lastly, in relation to the constant variance (homoscedasticity) and linearity assumptions, should I then apply just normal redisuals, standardized or studentized residuals?
Thanks in advance!
Best,
Anders
Related Posts with Testing the OLS assumptions in relation to standard robust errors
kappaetc / Krippendorff's alpha with missing values and across multiple variablesMy research team coded/classified a large set of documents. I took a random subset of 1000 from the …
Downloading data from Public API from json format to csv file or txt file so that I can read data in stata on macOSI have to download the following data from Business Dynamics Statistics ( which is public data provi…
Meta-analysis help: how to convert hazard ratio to risk ratioI am working on a meta-analysis using Stata. All the primary studies report risk ratio except one st…
Contrast tablesHi all, New Statalist user here with a simple question (I'm a long time Stata user who is trying to…
Panel data: Creating a bilateral dataset with countries and years (replicating the dataset for each panel)Hi everyone, I have a panel dataset of exchange rate with 200 countries and 16 years, please find b…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Testing the OLS assumptions in relation to standard robust errors
Post a Comment