Dear all,
I'm testing the OLS assumptions for a multiple cross-sectional regression model.
In relation to this, I would like to ask if one first have to test all the assumptions before running eventual standard robust errors-model (if heteroscedasticity is a problem).
So, should I first test for homoscedasticity and if heteroscedasticity is present then use standard robust errors. Should I then test for linearity and normality on the standard robust errors-model? Or should all OLS assumptions tests be carried out on the initial model?
Also, I would like to ask if somebody knows the code in stata for finding the 1 percent percentile and 99 percent percentile thresholds? (in relation to deleting outliers)
Lastly, in relation to the constant variance (homoscedasticity) and linearity assumptions, should I then apply just normal redisuals, standardized or studentized residuals?
Thanks in advance!
Best,
Anders
Related Posts with Testing the OLS assumptions in relation to standard robust errors
can't truncate length of trees (X-Axis) in horizontal dendrogramThe dataset I use to construct the attached dendrogram contains no cells with a dissimilarity value …
putpdf failed to add table, failed to set borderHello Statalist, I am trying to use putpdf to convert a surveyCTO-formatted survey into pdf, but I …
Repeated measures ANOVA: Standard errors of estimated marginal means produced by Stata's margins were different from that of SPSS's EMMEANSHi, Why the SE's of estimated marginal means differ in this case? And which one should be used if w…
estout by Ben Jann (available from ssc): Add horizontal lines to table, csv formatHello, after three hours of trying and searching, here is my question: Is there an elegant way to a…
Change Y axis for bar chartHi all, I am trying to make a simple bar chart. All of my means are very close together, between 3.…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Testing the OLS assumptions in relation to standard robust errors
Post a Comment