Dear all,
I'm testing the OLS assumptions for a multiple cross-sectional regression model.
In relation to this, I would like to ask if one first have to test all the assumptions before running eventual standard robust errors-model (if heteroscedasticity is a problem).
So, should I first test for homoscedasticity and if heteroscedasticity is present then use standard robust errors. Should I then test for linearity and normality on the standard robust errors-model? Or should all OLS assumptions tests be carried out on the initial model?
Also, I would like to ask if somebody knows the code in stata for finding the 1 percent percentile and 99 percent percentile thresholds? (in relation to deleting outliers)
Lastly, in relation to the constant variance (homoscedasticity) and linearity assumptions, should I then apply just normal redisuals, standardized or studentized residuals?
Thanks in advance!
Best,
Anders
Related Posts with Testing the OLS assumptions in relation to standard robust errors
Difference between mi append and appendReading through the mi append file right now and I fail to understand the difference between the two…
Outreg problem outdatedGood afternoon everyone, I have a replication task, which involves the use of outreg command. In th…
log log transformationI'm studying the firm size distribution i need to represent it in a double logarithmic form, my prob…
Multiple Imputation: generating variablesHi Members, This question is in relation to generating variables following Multiple Imputation. I …
Graphing options for decomposition resultsHi statalist, I am using the nldecompose command to examine intra cohort change and cohort replacem…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Testing the OLS assumptions in relation to standard robust errors
Post a Comment