Hi all
I want to test the association between childhood behaviour at age 6 years and earnings at age 36 (n=1000). The behavioural assessments were obtained from teachers when the children were aged 6. I want to control for clustering in the behavioural assessments at the school and classroom levels, although I’m not testing predictors at those levels. From what I understand, the mixed model is better although I would only report the fixed effects estimates, not the random effects, which seems amounts to a regular regression (with adjusted SE estimates). What are the pros and cons of using a mixed effects model vs. the cluster command? The advantage of the cluster command is simplicity and that I can still report standardised betas. Any suggestions welcome. See examples below – they produce similar results.
Many thanks
mixed OUTCOME behav1 behav2 etc || school: || Class:, vce(robust)
egen double_cluster=group (school class)
regress OUTCOME behav1 behav2 etc, vce(cluster double_cluster) robust
Related Posts with Mixed effects (multilevel) model vs. cluster command
Crop yaxis when using sts graph?Dear all, Does anyone know how to crop (or not show in some way) the highest part of the yaxis in a…
undo commandHello all, I have a question, would it be possible to undo last command, say I entered drop Age (va…
Heteroskedasticity and normality in Tobithow we can test heteroskedasticity assumption and normality assumption inTobit model? In case of use…
mfx, predict(xbsel)dear all may I use mfx, predict(xbsel) command after heckman to get marginal effect? thank you …
Specifying instruments for xtabond2Hi all, This is my first post, so apologize in advance for any posting mistake I may make. I am tr…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Mixed effects (multilevel) model vs. cluster command
Post a Comment