Hi all
I want to test the association between childhood behaviour at age 6 years and earnings at age 36 (n=1000). The behavioural assessments were obtained from teachers when the children were aged 6. I want to control for clustering in the behavioural assessments at the school and classroom levels, although I’m not testing predictors at those levels. From what I understand, the mixed model is better although I would only report the fixed effects estimates, not the random effects, which seems amounts to a regular regression (with adjusted SE estimates). What are the pros and cons of using a mixed effects model vs. the cluster command? The advantage of the cluster command is simplicity and that I can still report standardised betas. Any suggestions welcome. See examples below – they produce similar results.
Many thanks
mixed OUTCOME behav1 behav2 etc || school: || Class:, vce(robust)
egen double_cluster=group (school class)
regress OUTCOME behav1 behav2 etc, vce(cluster double_cluster) robust
Related Posts with Mixed effects (multilevel) model vs. cluster command
Stata Dialogue ProgrammingI was searching the documents and internet sources for an example on using radio buttons in dialogue…
Matching: Removing reversed causality?Hi everybody, I've read that endogeneity has many faces: One is omitted variable bias, another is m…
Increasing inner graph region to allow longer categorical x axis labels without overlapping – catplot with splitvallabelsDear Statalist, I am plotting a horizontal bar chart using catplot. Each categorical x axis label is…
How can I see the coefficients for the models used in gformula?Hello! I am using gformula for a mediation analysis, when I add an extra variable, the indirect eff…
Generating a dummy variable for observations within anotherHi everyone, I am having some problems in generating a variable matching two observations within the…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Mixed effects (multilevel) model vs. cluster command
Post a Comment