Hi all
I want to test the association between childhood behaviour at age 6 years and earnings at age 36 (n=1000). The behavioural assessments were obtained from teachers when the children were aged 6. I want to control for clustering in the behavioural assessments at the school and classroom levels, although I’m not testing predictors at those levels. From what I understand, the mixed model is better although I would only report the fixed effects estimates, not the random effects, which seems amounts to a regular regression (with adjusted SE estimates). What are the pros and cons of using a mixed effects model vs. the cluster command? The advantage of the cluster command is simplicity and that I can still report standardised betas. Any suggestions welcome. See examples below – they produce similar results.
Many thanks
mixed OUTCOME behav1 behav2 etc || school: || Class:, vce(robust)
egen double_cluster=group (school class)
regress OUTCOME behav1 behav2 etc, vce(cluster double_cluster) robust
Related Posts with Mixed effects (multilevel) model vs. cluster command
Problems with destring CIK numbersHi guys, In a dataset, I have rows with fyear (fiscal year) and CIK numbers, which are company iden…
Random (clustered) sampling without replacement keeping two strata population proportionsDear Statalist, My first post on this site so please bear with me for any 'mild' transgressions I m…
Is ~ a valid character in a variable name?-import delimited- and -insheet- create variable names with a tilde when the name in the first line …
Question on stcompetDear Statalisters, I have a question on the command stcompet. I am considering the entry into a ma…
new reshape issueSorry, this should be straightforward but I can't figure it out even after trying and using the manu…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Mixed effects (multilevel) model vs. cluster command
Post a Comment