Hi all
I want to test the association between childhood behaviour at age 6 years and earnings at age 36 (n=1000). The behavioural assessments were obtained from teachers when the children were aged 6. I want to control for clustering in the behavioural assessments at the school and classroom levels, although I’m not testing predictors at those levels. From what I understand, the mixed model is better although I would only report the fixed effects estimates, not the random effects, which seems amounts to a regular regression (with adjusted SE estimates). What are the pros and cons of using a mixed effects model vs. the cluster command? The advantage of the cluster command is simplicity and that I can still report standardised betas. Any suggestions welcome. See examples below – they produce similar results.
Many thanks
mixed OUTCOME behav1 behav2 etc || school: || Class:, vce(robust)
egen double_cluster=group (school class)
regress OUTCOME behav1 behav2 etc, vce(cluster double_cluster) robust
Related Posts with Mixed effects (multilevel) model vs. cluster command
Count number of time where at least x number of consecutive rows have the same valueHello, I have a large dataset which displays a status per time point. I want to count the number of…
Creating a new observation with specific "missing" valueGreetings! I have seen similar questions posted, but not close enough to what I need to figure out a…
Panel Probit/Logit Regression and time dummies- What to use?Hi all, I'm interested in running a probability model but I have some questions regarding with the …
How can I use control variables(dummy) in probit?Hello, I am working on my thesis and was my professor explained that for my dataset a probit analys…
Stored results for standard errorsHi, I am using probit regression and margins command thereafter. I am inquiring if the standard err…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Mixed effects (multilevel) model vs. cluster command
Post a Comment