Hi all
I want to test the association between childhood behaviour at age 6 years and earnings at age 36 (n=1000). The behavioural assessments were obtained from teachers when the children were aged 6. I want to control for clustering in the behavioural assessments at the school and classroom levels, although I’m not testing predictors at those levels. From what I understand, the mixed model is better although I would only report the fixed effects estimates, not the random effects, which seems amounts to a regular regression (with adjusted SE estimates). What are the pros and cons of using a mixed effects model vs. the cluster command? The advantage of the cluster command is simplicity and that I can still report standardised betas. Any suggestions welcome. See examples below – they produce similar results.
Many thanks
mixed OUTCOME behav1 behav2 etc || school: || Class:, vce(robust)
egen double_cluster=group (school class)
regress OUTCOME behav1 behav2 etc, vce(cluster double_cluster) robust
Related Posts with Mixed effects (multilevel) model vs. cluster command
Query regarding the Hansen statistic obtained after xtabond2Hello, I have a question regarding running the xtabond2 command, with alternating years of data. I …
Cleaning dataHi, first post on stata forum here: Hello. I have a survey dataset with lots of -5, -4, -3, -2, -1 f…
Panel Data CEO-firm fixed effectsDear Statalists, I am new to Stata. I have one inquiry on performing the CEO-firm fixed effects for…
Missing values generated after trying to generate ln function Before trying to generate my variable I had this variable. Code: * Example generated by -datae…
panel data graphHey there, I have a problem with a panel data graph. I have 24 countries in my data but stata only …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Mixed effects (multilevel) model vs. cluster command
Post a Comment