I am currently running panel regression with random effects and there is a result that I cant fully interprete myself. I hope you might be able to help.
Consider the situation:
I am running a first regression where the independent variable X has a significant effect on the dependent variable Y.
In the second regression I am introducing the interaction term of X and a moderation variable Z. The term XZ is inisgnificant but X becomes insignificant as well despite the insignificance of XZ.
How would you interpret this? It might be obvious but I cant really get my head around this. How does the interaction term cause X to become insignificant despite being insignificant itself?
Thanks for the help
Related Posts with Interpretation of significances with moderation effect
xttobit or fracreg for panel data? My dependent variable is from 0 to 1.Hello everyone, I am a PhD student from strategy area. I encountered a problem in model choice. My d…
How do I check goodness of fit when using "xtmlogit"?Hello, I'm trying to use "xtmlogit", a newly introduced command in stata17. How do I check the goodn…
Predicting values using Simple Linear Regression on Categorical DataHi everyone, I have student scores for two test components (Component1 & Component2) from 485 s…
ANCOVA or MANCOVA? Help is MUCH appreciatedHi all, I am undertaking a thesis and it has been a long while since I've been at university (and u…
Estimating adjusted mean difference by treatment group, following -regress-I am looking to calculate the adjusted mean difference in heart rate by treatment groups (alloc) - t…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpretation of significances with moderation effect
Post a Comment