I am currently running panel regression with random effects and there is a result that I cant fully interprete myself. I hope you might be able to help.
Consider the situation:
I am running a first regression where the independent variable X has a significant effect on the dependent variable Y.
In the second regression I am introducing the interaction term of X and a moderation variable Z. The term XZ is inisgnificant but X becomes insignificant as well despite the insignificance of XZ.
How would you interpret this? It might be obvious but I cant really get my head around this. How does the interaction term cause X to become insignificant despite being insignificant itself?
Thanks for the help
Related Posts with Interpretation of significances with moderation effect
How to download API data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics?Hi, I would like to download API data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Unfortunately and surpri…
Converting from long to wide formatDear all, I'm trying to convert from long to wide format: Code: reshape wide _proc_code _proc_eye…
mtefe with interactive fixed effectsHello everyone! First time poster, long time lurker here I'm working on a project that requires obt…
Polygons hidden behind others when creating choropleth map using spmapHi everyone - this is my first ever post on this forum. I've been having a problem using the spmap …
Importing a matrix into stata file: Col numbersDear Statalisters I have a matrix with column names equal numbers, when I run svmat matrix, and Stat…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpretation of significances with moderation effect
Post a Comment